![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | Star Trek: Titan received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article. |
|
Why do we need a section on minor characters? Clearly an article about the series should tell the reader who Riker and his senior crew are, but why bother with [Hostile Alien #2] and the like? - Hayter 05:19, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
USS Titan Article says much of the same thing rather than request a delete of the USS Titan Article lets merge it into it. Aeon 19:31, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
I'm going through and revamping the whole thing now, so if everyone would hold off on editing until I'm done...probably around 15:45 UTC. Thanks, Chuck 14:57, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
Riker was transferred from the Enterprise-E on stardate 56844.9 (or 2379).
Riker was transferred from the Enterprise-E circa stardate 56844.9 (2379).
See USS Titan (NCC-80102). — pd_THOR | =/\= | 02:52, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
Ok first, the reason I had taken the circa out of the article before was because it sounds kinda funny in that context, maybe a better word would be appropriate. About the part that was added, concerning the movie Nemesis not mentioning that it was Luna class, I do not believe that that fits into this article. This article is about the Star Trek: Titan books in particular, and has a sub-section that is labelesd USS Titan. Thus the information in that section is about the USS Titan in the context of the Star Trek: Titan novels. Also, the movie does not mention it's crew compliment, ship size or other important features, but we can't make non-canonical notes about all these. I believe that the last sentence in the intro paragraph is sufficient to cover the whole article. Chuck 23:46, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
I created the infobox not too long ago, but am now realizing that Titan is gonna start getting more and more books. The infobox doesn't look too crowded with just the three books in it, but when do we get rid of it? Will we continue to add plot summaries of every Titan book that is published (I think that that would still be pretty cool)? Maybe if more were written about each book, a small one book infobox could be added to each subsection. Just looking for any ideas...thanks, Chuck 11:20, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
I notice the character paragraphs contain information about the person before they came abour titan. Would it not be more appropriate to have the paragraph about their role on Titan, since the link to their page would tell them the other info. This would help with the problem of a limited paragraph on Vale too. Just an idea, what do you think? Ch u ck (척뉴넘) 07:12, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
Is this a real ship. It keeps getting readded, and I've never read AOF, so I can't verify it. Ch u ck (contrib) 23:41, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
I was going to argue that the TrekBBS link is not a bad source, as the forum is verifiably visited by several Trek fiction authors and editors, one of whom posted the information, but it's just been "confirmed" by Psi Phi, which is apparently good enough, so I'll just point the link there. Brendan Moody 03:23, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
Image:Titan Series.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 01:49, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
July 2007 is pretty far in the past now (the planned release date of Sword of Damocles). Does anyone know of its fate? It would be good to update that section in the article with more recent developments. Hint: Amazon has a page about it http://www.amazon.com/Sword-Damocles-Star-Trek-Titan/dp/1416526943. -- OranL ( talk) 10:53, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
The plot summaries for the second and third novels are taken verbatum from the back of the book; this is not allowed. Lots42 ( talk) 05:55, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
Sight Unseen ( ISBN 9781476783161) was released in September 2015 & Fortune of War ( ISBN 9781501152009) is scheduled for November 2017. They should be add. 198.147.202.122 ( talk) 18:35, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | Star Trek: Titan received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article. |
|
Why do we need a section on minor characters? Clearly an article about the series should tell the reader who Riker and his senior crew are, but why bother with [Hostile Alien #2] and the like? - Hayter 05:19, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
USS Titan Article says much of the same thing rather than request a delete of the USS Titan Article lets merge it into it. Aeon 19:31, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
I'm going through and revamping the whole thing now, so if everyone would hold off on editing until I'm done...probably around 15:45 UTC. Thanks, Chuck 14:57, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
Riker was transferred from the Enterprise-E on stardate 56844.9 (or 2379).
Riker was transferred from the Enterprise-E circa stardate 56844.9 (2379).
See USS Titan (NCC-80102). — pd_THOR | =/\= | 02:52, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
Ok first, the reason I had taken the circa out of the article before was because it sounds kinda funny in that context, maybe a better word would be appropriate. About the part that was added, concerning the movie Nemesis not mentioning that it was Luna class, I do not believe that that fits into this article. This article is about the Star Trek: Titan books in particular, and has a sub-section that is labelesd USS Titan. Thus the information in that section is about the USS Titan in the context of the Star Trek: Titan novels. Also, the movie does not mention it's crew compliment, ship size or other important features, but we can't make non-canonical notes about all these. I believe that the last sentence in the intro paragraph is sufficient to cover the whole article. Chuck 23:46, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
I created the infobox not too long ago, but am now realizing that Titan is gonna start getting more and more books. The infobox doesn't look too crowded with just the three books in it, but when do we get rid of it? Will we continue to add plot summaries of every Titan book that is published (I think that that would still be pretty cool)? Maybe if more were written about each book, a small one book infobox could be added to each subsection. Just looking for any ideas...thanks, Chuck 11:20, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
I notice the character paragraphs contain information about the person before they came abour titan. Would it not be more appropriate to have the paragraph about their role on Titan, since the link to their page would tell them the other info. This would help with the problem of a limited paragraph on Vale too. Just an idea, what do you think? Ch u ck (척뉴넘) 07:12, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
Is this a real ship. It keeps getting readded, and I've never read AOF, so I can't verify it. Ch u ck (contrib) 23:41, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
I was going to argue that the TrekBBS link is not a bad source, as the forum is verifiably visited by several Trek fiction authors and editors, one of whom posted the information, but it's just been "confirmed" by Psi Phi, which is apparently good enough, so I'll just point the link there. Brendan Moody 03:23, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
Image:Titan Series.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 01:49, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
July 2007 is pretty far in the past now (the planned release date of Sword of Damocles). Does anyone know of its fate? It would be good to update that section in the article with more recent developments. Hint: Amazon has a page about it http://www.amazon.com/Sword-Damocles-Star-Trek-Titan/dp/1416526943. -- OranL ( talk) 10:53, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
The plot summaries for the second and third novels are taken verbatum from the back of the book; this is not allowed. Lots42 ( talk) 05:55, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
Sight Unseen ( ISBN 9781476783161) was released in September 2015 & Fortune of War ( ISBN 9781501152009) is scheduled for November 2017. They should be add. 198.147.202.122 ( talk) 18:35, 13 May 2017 (UTC)