![]() | Stane Street has been listed as one of the
History good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: December 20, 2020. ( Reviewed version). |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Stane Street (Chichester). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 06:58, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Jaguar ( talk · contribs) 13:49, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
Looks like a solid article. I'll leave my comments soon. ♦
jaguar
13:49, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
This is a well-written and comprehensive article. I thoroughly enjoyed reading it. I've made a few minor formatting edits, and most of my points above are mainly centred around minor issues like formatting or some instances of choppy sentences. I'll put this on hold until the points are clarified, otherwise this is very close to meeting the GA criteria.
On hold ♦
jaguar
13:22, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
Section | Done? | Comment |
---|---|---|
Lead | ![]() |
All references removed. |
Surveying | ![]() |
All comments addressed. |
Design and construction | ![]() |
Conversion template added. |
Posting stations | ![]() |
Both comments addressed. |
Route | ![]() |
All comments addressed. |
Decline and partial abandonment | ![]() |
All comments addressed. |
Historiography | ![]() |
Comment addressed. |
This is useful info but I have no idea where to include a short summary
Recent aerial survey by Historic England for the Secrets of the High Woods Project (working in partnership with the South Downs National Park) has now firmly identified the remains of this Roman road, the existence of which has long been a subject for speculation. The discovery has depended on a combination of aerial photography and lidar (airborne laser scanning) data; the latter technique’s great strength is its potential to reveal sites in heavily-wooded areas. https://historicengland.org.uk/whats-new/research/back-issues/lost-roman-road/ Peter K Burian ( talk) 02:36, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
![]() | Stane Street has been listed as one of the
History good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: December 20, 2020. ( Reviewed version). |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Stane Street (Chichester). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 06:58, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Jaguar ( talk · contribs) 13:49, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
Looks like a solid article. I'll leave my comments soon. ♦
jaguar
13:49, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
This is a well-written and comprehensive article. I thoroughly enjoyed reading it. I've made a few minor formatting edits, and most of my points above are mainly centred around minor issues like formatting or some instances of choppy sentences. I'll put this on hold until the points are clarified, otherwise this is very close to meeting the GA criteria.
On hold ♦
jaguar
13:22, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
Section | Done? | Comment |
---|---|---|
Lead | ![]() |
All references removed. |
Surveying | ![]() |
All comments addressed. |
Design and construction | ![]() |
Conversion template added. |
Posting stations | ![]() |
Both comments addressed. |
Route | ![]() |
All comments addressed. |
Decline and partial abandonment | ![]() |
All comments addressed. |
Historiography | ![]() |
Comment addressed. |
This is useful info but I have no idea where to include a short summary
Recent aerial survey by Historic England for the Secrets of the High Woods Project (working in partnership with the South Downs National Park) has now firmly identified the remains of this Roman road, the existence of which has long been a subject for speculation. The discovery has depended on a combination of aerial photography and lidar (airborne laser scanning) data; the latter technique’s great strength is its potential to reveal sites in heavily-wooded areas. https://historicengland.org.uk/whats-new/research/back-issues/lost-roman-road/ Peter K Burian ( talk) 02:36, 20 February 2023 (UTC)