This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
What question is there on neutrality here? Yes, the article could use some rewriting and editing, but I don't see anything here about the piece not following NPOV. If anyone has criticisms of the article, please let everyone else know what they are.-- Pinko1977 08:49, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
I apologize. I changed it from NPOV to clean-up. 75.17.199.141 19:37, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
We should get a birthday on this article. I'm thinking Novermberish?
I tracert'd the IP that gave the bulk of this article, and it leads to his hometown. I have no problem with this, since Goff's biography is a little elusive in the first place. Neither am I accusing him of writing it with much of a bias (if he wrote it at all). But this is a very messy article, and I'm hesitant to hyper-edit willy-nilly on someone's bio. He deserves a more clean and concise entry.
Just want to let you all know (and I apologize for being a bit underhanded with the tracert, but I had a hunch. It wasn't my intention.)
I am cleaning up this article. Bmedley Sutler 07:54, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
I'm new to wikipedia and not sure how to add sources. But here is a link to the article he wrote for counterpunch: http://www.counterpunch.org/goff11142003.html
I would argue that Stan Goff and his writings are very significant to veterans in the anti-war movement. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thefox226G ( talk • contribs) 22:47, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
What question is there on neutrality here? Yes, the article could use some rewriting and editing, but I don't see anything here about the piece not following NPOV. If anyone has criticisms of the article, please let everyone else know what they are.-- Pinko1977 08:49, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
I apologize. I changed it from NPOV to clean-up. 75.17.199.141 19:37, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
We should get a birthday on this article. I'm thinking Novermberish?
I tracert'd the IP that gave the bulk of this article, and it leads to his hometown. I have no problem with this, since Goff's biography is a little elusive in the first place. Neither am I accusing him of writing it with much of a bias (if he wrote it at all). But this is a very messy article, and I'm hesitant to hyper-edit willy-nilly on someone's bio. He deserves a more clean and concise entry.
Just want to let you all know (and I apologize for being a bit underhanded with the tracert, but I had a hunch. It wasn't my intention.)
I am cleaning up this article. Bmedley Sutler 07:54, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
I'm new to wikipedia and not sure how to add sources. But here is a link to the article he wrote for counterpunch: http://www.counterpunch.org/goff11142003.html
I would argue that Stan Goff and his writings are very significant to veterans in the anti-war movement. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thefox226G ( talk • contribs) 22:47, 1 April 2010 (UTC)