This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
St Kilda Football Club article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
St Kilda Football Club has been listed as one of the
Sports and recreation good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: January 18, 2022. ( Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
What does the table of Attendances represent? It seems like a mix of all attendances, with the inclusion of the 22,000 against Port Adelaide. Needs to be changed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.181.29.189 ( talk) 05:50, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
Do Not Valndalise the factual information plced on the article.
Have reverted the article back to the version with the encyclopedic information regarding our clubs awards and honours.
DONT ACT LIKE A MORON. IF YOU ARE ONE LEAVE THE ARTICLES TO SOMEONE WITH A SENSE OF FACT.
210.50.228.5 ( talk) 01:28, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
According to the company names registry, "St Kilda Saints Football Club Ltd" is the new legal name of the social club only - and NOT the football club itself which appears to be still registered under the name of "St Kilda Football Club Ltd". If anyone has any evidence to the contrary then please provide it. Otherwise please don't change the official name of the club in the article. Afterwriting ( talk) 17:03, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
It it becoming increasingly apparent that this article - and other St Kilda F.C. articles - is once again being subjected to sockpuppet editing by an indefinitely blocked user. I am currently monitoring the suspected sockpuppet's edits. Afterwriting ( talk) 16:08, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
It has become increasingly obvious that the "new" editor User:BawBaw1 is yet another in the long list of sockpuppet accounts of the indefinitely blocked user User:BrianBeahr. I have, therefore, reverted his most recent edits. Brian, I do not wish for you to be indefinitely blocked, but you have been for numerous valid reasons. If you want to edit on Wikipedia you will need to do so by following the correct process for getting yourself unblocked. Seeking to avoid the block by continuing to create sockpuppet accounts will not achieve anything. You really need to understand this and do something about it. Afterwriting ( talk) 11:05, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
{{edit semi-protected}}
(the entire article was copied here. it has been deleted for the sake of brevity elektrik SHOOS 05:21, 19 September 2010 (UTC))
210.50.115.227 ( talk) 05:14, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
{{edit semi-protected}} To update the 2010 GF results
CrysysKore ( talk) 08:10, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
Anx10else think that the artice need soures and is pro st kilda? Stilltha1 ( talk) 11:03, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
tha latest scandal should be added! it show it ture side. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stilltha1 ( talk • contribs) 01:32, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
Nearly all pages for other AFL clubs have this, so St Kilda needs it as well. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sverik25 ( talk • contribs) 07:00, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
I'm bringing this here because it's one of the clubs Mick has been associated with. I'm just seeking a few more views on a discussion underway about an image an editor has proposed for the article. See the article history and the Tak page. HiLo48 ( talk) 03:14, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: The C of E ( talk · contribs) 17:34, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
I will review this within the next few days.
The C of E God Save the Queen! (
talk)
17:34, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Here is my review
Didn't the club have a dalliance with the nickname "Panthers" for a few years? 2001:44B8:201:6C00:2CF9:F9EE:487A:3D67 ( talk) 07:53, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
Not sure why this is as it is the same club, just a different team. The other article seems to insinuate that it is a separate club "franchise". Rulesfan ( talk) 01:00, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
St Kilda Football Club article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
St Kilda Football Club has been listed as one of the
Sports and recreation good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: January 18, 2022. ( Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
What does the table of Attendances represent? It seems like a mix of all attendances, with the inclusion of the 22,000 against Port Adelaide. Needs to be changed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.181.29.189 ( talk) 05:50, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
Do Not Valndalise the factual information plced on the article.
Have reverted the article back to the version with the encyclopedic information regarding our clubs awards and honours.
DONT ACT LIKE A MORON. IF YOU ARE ONE LEAVE THE ARTICLES TO SOMEONE WITH A SENSE OF FACT.
210.50.228.5 ( talk) 01:28, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
According to the company names registry, "St Kilda Saints Football Club Ltd" is the new legal name of the social club only - and NOT the football club itself which appears to be still registered under the name of "St Kilda Football Club Ltd". If anyone has any evidence to the contrary then please provide it. Otherwise please don't change the official name of the club in the article. Afterwriting ( talk) 17:03, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
It it becoming increasingly apparent that this article - and other St Kilda F.C. articles - is once again being subjected to sockpuppet editing by an indefinitely blocked user. I am currently monitoring the suspected sockpuppet's edits. Afterwriting ( talk) 16:08, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
It has become increasingly obvious that the "new" editor User:BawBaw1 is yet another in the long list of sockpuppet accounts of the indefinitely blocked user User:BrianBeahr. I have, therefore, reverted his most recent edits. Brian, I do not wish for you to be indefinitely blocked, but you have been for numerous valid reasons. If you want to edit on Wikipedia you will need to do so by following the correct process for getting yourself unblocked. Seeking to avoid the block by continuing to create sockpuppet accounts will not achieve anything. You really need to understand this and do something about it. Afterwriting ( talk) 11:05, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
{{edit semi-protected}}
(the entire article was copied here. it has been deleted for the sake of brevity elektrik SHOOS 05:21, 19 September 2010 (UTC))
210.50.115.227 ( talk) 05:14, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
{{edit semi-protected}} To update the 2010 GF results
CrysysKore ( talk) 08:10, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
Anx10else think that the artice need soures and is pro st kilda? Stilltha1 ( talk) 11:03, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
tha latest scandal should be added! it show it ture side. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stilltha1 ( talk • contribs) 01:32, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
Nearly all pages for other AFL clubs have this, so St Kilda needs it as well. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sverik25 ( talk • contribs) 07:00, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
I'm bringing this here because it's one of the clubs Mick has been associated with. I'm just seeking a few more views on a discussion underway about an image an editor has proposed for the article. See the article history and the Tak page. HiLo48 ( talk) 03:14, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: The C of E ( talk · contribs) 17:34, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
I will review this within the next few days.
The C of E God Save the Queen! (
talk)
17:34, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Here is my review
Didn't the club have a dalliance with the nickname "Panthers" for a few years? 2001:44B8:201:6C00:2CF9:F9EE:487A:3D67 ( talk) 07:53, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
Not sure why this is as it is the same club, just a different team. The other article seems to insinuate that it is a separate club "franchise". Rulesfan ( talk) 01:00, 6 April 2023 (UTC)