![]() | St. Agnes Hospital (Raleigh, North Carolina) has been listed as one of the
History good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: August 20, 2022. ( Reviewed version). |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Sammi Brie ( talk · contribs) 02:37, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not) |
---|
|
Overall: |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Some copy tweaks are needed; the Site ruins section, on the other hand, will require a couple of paragraphs of new prose to incorporate a series of newspaper references I'm including along that will firm up much of the post-1961 history of this building. This is a bit unusual, but I recognize that the purpose of my Newspapers.com subscription is to build up Wikipedia. (Thanks,
WP:TWL!) 7-day hold to
Indy beetle.
Sammi Brie (she/her •
t •
c)
03:06, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
It looks like the building had some use after this, for storage and one senior program, and there was an attempt to use federal funds to rehab the building in the 1990s and another attempt to rehab it as administrative space, which turned into a much-delayed quagmire. The number of references I have turned up (while understanding not everyone has NP.com) will likely result in some big work on the Legacy section.) Every reference after this sentence is fully formed and ready for insertion. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]
![]() | St. Agnes Hospital (Raleigh, North Carolina) has been listed as one of the
History good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: August 20, 2022. ( Reviewed version). |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Sammi Brie ( talk · contribs) 02:37, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not) |
---|
|
Overall: |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Some copy tweaks are needed; the Site ruins section, on the other hand, will require a couple of paragraphs of new prose to incorporate a series of newspaper references I'm including along that will firm up much of the post-1961 history of this building. This is a bit unusual, but I recognize that the purpose of my Newspapers.com subscription is to build up Wikipedia. (Thanks,
WP:TWL!) 7-day hold to
Indy beetle.
Sammi Brie (she/her •
t •
c)
03:06, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
It looks like the building had some use after this, for storage and one senior program, and there was an attempt to use federal funds to rehab the building in the 1990s and another attempt to rehab it as administrative space, which turned into a much-delayed quagmire. The number of references I have turned up (while understanding not everyone has NP.com) will likely result in some big work on the Legacy section.) Every reference after this sentence is fully formed and ready for insertion. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]