This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

India: Delhi / Education Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Delhi (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by the Education in India workgroup (assessed as Low-importance). Higher education This article is within the scope of WikiProject Higher education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of higher education, universities, and colleges on Wikipedia. Please visit the project page to join the discussion, and see the project's article guideline for useful advice.Higher educationWikipedia:WikiProject Higher educationTemplate:WikiProject Higher educationHigher education articles Guild of Copy Editors This article was copy edited by Stfg, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on 2 March 2012.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors articles

Note: {{ WP India}} Project Banner with Delhi workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under Category:Delhi or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- Amartyabag ^TALK2ME 03:52, 6 July 2008 (UTC) reply

The image File:DU Logo1.png is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
• That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. -- 06:14, 12 February 2011 (UTC) reply

The rankings given in the "India Today rankings in 2011" were simply not borne out by the sources. I have corrected them. -- Stfg ( talk) 21:56, 2 March 2012 (UTC) reply

Hello editors, I have been following this article for a while. It is a fact as pointed out by certain notable sources that the college was in a suspected fund scam in late 2000s. It is 2017 and the article still has a section on the controversy. I was thinking if it will be appropriate to have the section removed as it is no longer relevant with the article. Best, KakhoSimpson ( talk) 10:16, 3 June 2017 (UTC) reply