Howdy. I'm going to review this for GA. Intothewoods29 ( talk) 17:24, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
Well I'm pretty sure this one's a pass! Looks great (although really long!). Plenty of refs and pics... Only suggestions that would be needed for FA would be to fix the couple of red links on the page and the section on Shoba Sakthi in literature; it's about novels and it comes in the theatre section. Other than that, looks good.
GA Requirements:
1.well-written, organized, easy to follow, everything explained or wikilinked.
2.lots of reliable refs, no original research as far as I can see
3. stays focused, is well-organized
4.NPOV
5. stable
6. appropriately illustrated with tagged images
Good job. Feel free to keep improving it in whatever way you can! Intothewoods29 ( talk) 17:50, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
Howdy. I'm going to review this for GA. Intothewoods29 ( talk) 17:24, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
Well I'm pretty sure this one's a pass! Looks great (although really long!). Plenty of refs and pics... Only suggestions that would be needed for FA would be to fix the couple of red links on the page and the section on Shoba Sakthi in literature; it's about novels and it comes in the theatre section. Other than that, looks good.
GA Requirements:
1.well-written, organized, easy to follow, everything explained or wikilinked.
2.lots of reliable refs, no original research as far as I can see
3. stays focused, is well-organized
4.NPOV
5. stable
6. appropriately illustrated with tagged images
Good job. Feel free to keep improving it in whatever way you can! Intothewoods29 ( talk) 17:50, 30 July 2008 (UTC)