![]() | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
Hello there. I have been mentioned by @ BoyTheKingCanDance for mentioning unreferenced citations. While I have replied to him on the talk page I will mention it once more.
If you find any part of my article containing unreferenced citations feel free to call me out in the talk page before deleting it unnecessarily.
Here is what I replied on my talk page:
Rasalghul1711 ( talk) 20:18, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
If significant views include negative criticism of the article subject published in reliable sources, then they should be incorporated into the article content in an appropriate and neutral way.
Often it is best to integrate the negative criticism into the article: negative information is woven throughout the article in the appropriate topical sections
For a specific controversy that is broadly covered in reliable sources. Various positions, whether pro or contra, are given due weight as supported by the sources. The topic of the controversy is best named in the section title (when there are distinct groups of controversies, the section title can be "Controversies", with subsection titles indicating what these are about).
Great care should be taken that the section is not an WP:INDISCRIMINATE list of complaints
For a specific controversy regarding the topic, when such topic takes a prominent place in the reliable sources on the topic.
Avoid mixed bag section titles like "Controversies" without it being clear in the section title (or in the titles of the subsections of such section) what these controversies are about.
![]() | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
Hello there. I have been mentioned by @ BoyTheKingCanDance for mentioning unreferenced citations. While I have replied to him on the talk page I will mention it once more.
If you find any part of my article containing unreferenced citations feel free to call me out in the talk page before deleting it unnecessarily.
Here is what I replied on my talk page:
Rasalghul1711 ( talk) 20:18, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
If significant views include negative criticism of the article subject published in reliable sources, then they should be incorporated into the article content in an appropriate and neutral way.
Often it is best to integrate the negative criticism into the article: negative information is woven throughout the article in the appropriate topical sections
For a specific controversy that is broadly covered in reliable sources. Various positions, whether pro or contra, are given due weight as supported by the sources. The topic of the controversy is best named in the section title (when there are distinct groups of controversies, the section title can be "Controversies", with subsection titles indicating what these are about).
Great care should be taken that the section is not an WP:INDISCRIMINATE list of complaints
For a specific controversy regarding the topic, when such topic takes a prominent place in the reliable sources on the topic.
Avoid mixed bag section titles like "Controversies" without it being clear in the section title (or in the titles of the subsections of such section) what these controversies are about.