This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
As far as I know, spin-charge separation was first observed directly in Cleaved-Edge overgrowth quantum wires, by Auslander et al., where the entire dispersion of the 1D modes was measured. This is reported in Science 295: Tunneling Spectroscopy of the Elementary Excitations in a One-Dimensional wireâPreceding unsigned comment added by 140.247.59.113 ( talk ⢠contribs) 07:48, October 1, 2007
Surely it can't be arbitrary which of the spinon or chargon is fermionic? After all, there's a huge difference between a Bose-Einstein and a Fermi-Dirac statistics!!! AnonyScientist ( talk) 09:42, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
I am about to undo damage [1] inflicted by an obscure user APJoker ( talk ¡ contribs). The previous text was not sourced either, but APJokerâs revision heavily contributed in blamanism and confusionism. Objections? Incnis Mrsi ( talk) 16:08, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
It's been suggested that this article should be merged into the Cooper pair article. â V = I * R ( talk) 22:46, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
I've made some substantial changes to the article, in the hope of making it a bit clearer. The main changes are:
1. I've rewritten the first couple of sentences to couch it in terms of deconfinement, which is the standard language that physicists use to talk about these things. The point is that you can always think of an electron as these two separate particles if you like, but in virtually every case the chargon and spinon are bound together and you can't separate them (like quarks in a proton). Only in certain situations do the two become deconfined, meaning that they are no longer in a bound state and can behave as separate particles (like quarks in the quark-gluon plasma).
2. I've removed the discussion of statistics from the part where the counterintuitiveness is pointed out. Statistics aren't so important, because this mostly applies in 1D. The main thing is that you can't build a chargon up out of electrons, unlike a Cooper pair, say. The discussion of statistics is in its own paragraph below.
I'm not sure that I'd really consider myself an expert on this, but I've removed the tag. Stevvers ( talk) 14:53, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
Is spinâcharge separation real (part of accepted theory) or is it speculative? 84.227.20.67 ( talk) 15:24, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
As far as I know, spin-charge separation was first observed directly in Cleaved-Edge overgrowth quantum wires, by Auslander et al., where the entire dispersion of the 1D modes was measured. This is reported in Science 295: Tunneling Spectroscopy of the Elementary Excitations in a One-Dimensional wireâPreceding unsigned comment added by 140.247.59.113 ( talk ⢠contribs) 07:48, October 1, 2007
Surely it can't be arbitrary which of the spinon or chargon is fermionic? After all, there's a huge difference between a Bose-Einstein and a Fermi-Dirac statistics!!! AnonyScientist ( talk) 09:42, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
I am about to undo damage [1] inflicted by an obscure user APJoker ( talk ¡ contribs). The previous text was not sourced either, but APJokerâs revision heavily contributed in blamanism and confusionism. Objections? Incnis Mrsi ( talk) 16:08, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
It's been suggested that this article should be merged into the Cooper pair article. â V = I * R ( talk) 22:46, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
I've made some substantial changes to the article, in the hope of making it a bit clearer. The main changes are:
1. I've rewritten the first couple of sentences to couch it in terms of deconfinement, which is the standard language that physicists use to talk about these things. The point is that you can always think of an electron as these two separate particles if you like, but in virtually every case the chargon and spinon are bound together and you can't separate them (like quarks in a proton). Only in certain situations do the two become deconfined, meaning that they are no longer in a bound state and can behave as separate particles (like quarks in the quark-gluon plasma).
2. I've removed the discussion of statistics from the part where the counterintuitiveness is pointed out. Statistics aren't so important, because this mostly applies in 1D. The main thing is that you can't build a chargon up out of electrons, unlike a Cooper pair, say. The discussion of statistics is in its own paragraph below.
I'm not sure that I'd really consider myself an expert on this, but I've removed the tag. Stevvers ( talk) 14:53, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
Is spinâcharge separation real (part of accepted theory) or is it speculative? 84.227.20.67 ( talk) 15:24, 13 August 2015 (UTC)