Spider-Woman (Gwen Stacy) has been listed as one of the
Language and literature good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: July 31, 2017. ( Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:
|
Does it make sense to have a Spider-Woman (Gwen Stacy) article and seperate Spider-Gwen? They should be merged Rachelskit ( talk) 14:14, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
Spoke too soon! It got reverted. Jhenderson 777 02:51, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Wouldn't there be a lot of duplication? Also confusion when people are searching for Spider-Gwen and they find two separate pages?
The comic history would be listed on the comic series page. It was added to the Marvel Multiverse template to represent Earth-65. I am suggesting that we add a character section to talk about the brief info on the Earth-65 characters that have Earth-616 counterparts and a detailed information of those Earth-65 characters that don't have Earth-616 counterparts like the Bodega Bandit, a variation of the Yancy Street Gang, and the organization S.I.L.K. which is run by the Earth-65 version of Cindy Moon. -- Rtkat3 ( talk) 15:06, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
Does anybody know the collected editions involved? Rachelskit ( talk) 17:01, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Adamstom.97 ( talk · contribs) 23:37, 24 June 2017 (UTC)
Think I'll give reviewing this a go. I've never reviewed a comics-based article, but I have been involved with some and I have reviewed a few TV and film articles, so this should not be too difficult. - adamstom97 ( talk) 23:37, 24 June 2017 (UTC)
Here are some issues that I have found in the first couple of sections that need to be addressed:
Take care of those, and then the character summary needs a copy-edit. There are sentences in there that definitely don't make sense, and there is also quite a bit of info that seems to be there just to explain the differences between Earth-65 and the normal universe, which isn't what this page is for (the separate Spider-Gwen article can cover those differences). I'll carry on with the rest of the article once this stuff is covered. - adamstom97 ( talk) 21:54, 25 June 2017 (UTC)
I think that all looks pretty good. Just give that summary a copy-edit and I'll have a look over the rest of the article. - adamstom97 ( talk) 05:19, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
I am starting from the beginning of the article again. Unfortunately, it looks like your copy-editor hasn't done a great job of making sure the article is well written and sensical, which is a big part of GA. I'll do my best to help fix that now, but there is still a lot of this article written in poor English.
My bad. Done. Jhenderson 777 00:13, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
Let me know if there are any problems with these points. - adamstom97 ( talk) 23:06, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
@ Jhenderson777: Sorry for the long wait, I've been busy of late and this slipped my mind. Firstly, a few things that I have found just going over the article again:
Other than those, the article is looking pretty good. Referencing is fine, cosplay image is fine. The other three images could do with better rationales for being used—you need to convince the strictest editors that you have a good reason to include those. Sort those things out and we'll probably be good to go. - adamstom97 ( talk) 00:26, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
Is it really notable to be listed 7th out of a list of 10?
Gwen Stacy's Spider-Woman was named number seven in a list of the best Spider-Men by Newsarama.[45]
I thought maybe it could be improved by adding context and mentioning that the list was published in March 2016 and the character was relatively new but the very next sentence has a list from April 2016 calling her the 2nd greatest alt-Spidey. I suggest dropping this faint praise entirely as it is counter-productive. -- 109.77.209.152 ( talk) 02:50, 14 October 2018 (UTC)
Aren´t the reviews a bit one-sided? The character might have gotten mostly positive reviews but it´shard to believe there was no negative criticism anywhere. 77.179.172.214 ( talk) 11:33, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
One or more images currently used in this article have been nominated for deletion as violations of the non-free content criteria (NFCC).
You can read more about what this means and why these files are being nominated for deletion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Comics#Image deletion nominations for NFCC 8 and 3a.
You can participate at the deletion discussion(s) at Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2020 May 4. If you are not familiar with NFCC-related deletion discussions, I recommend reading the post linked above first.
Sincerely, The Squirrel Conspiracy ( talk) 06:53, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
This article is duplicated here: https://wikipedia.org/wiki/spider-gwen 2806:2F0:51E0:5748:11F0:250E:41B5:80B4 ( talk) 13:13, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
Gwen but and alternate version appears first to my knowledge in “The Amazing Spider-man” series 68.100.230.171 ( talk) 13:54, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
Last I checked, Spider-Gwen/Ghost-Spider's name was more-or-less consistently spelled "Gwendolyn Stacy" without an e, both by her creators and all but one subsequent writer. 2001:569:F875:3D00:210E:D96F:44F7:8C1E ( talk) 2001:569:F875:3D00:210E:D96F:44F7:8C1E ( talk) 03:04, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
Spider-Woman (Gwen Stacy) has been listed as one of the
Language and literature good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: July 31, 2017. ( Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:
|
Does it make sense to have a Spider-Woman (Gwen Stacy) article and seperate Spider-Gwen? They should be merged Rachelskit ( talk) 14:14, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
Spoke too soon! It got reverted. Jhenderson 777 02:51, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Wouldn't there be a lot of duplication? Also confusion when people are searching for Spider-Gwen and they find two separate pages?
The comic history would be listed on the comic series page. It was added to the Marvel Multiverse template to represent Earth-65. I am suggesting that we add a character section to talk about the brief info on the Earth-65 characters that have Earth-616 counterparts and a detailed information of those Earth-65 characters that don't have Earth-616 counterparts like the Bodega Bandit, a variation of the Yancy Street Gang, and the organization S.I.L.K. which is run by the Earth-65 version of Cindy Moon. -- Rtkat3 ( talk) 15:06, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
Does anybody know the collected editions involved? Rachelskit ( talk) 17:01, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Adamstom.97 ( talk · contribs) 23:37, 24 June 2017 (UTC)
Think I'll give reviewing this a go. I've never reviewed a comics-based article, but I have been involved with some and I have reviewed a few TV and film articles, so this should not be too difficult. - adamstom97 ( talk) 23:37, 24 June 2017 (UTC)
Here are some issues that I have found in the first couple of sections that need to be addressed:
Take care of those, and then the character summary needs a copy-edit. There are sentences in there that definitely don't make sense, and there is also quite a bit of info that seems to be there just to explain the differences between Earth-65 and the normal universe, which isn't what this page is for (the separate Spider-Gwen article can cover those differences). I'll carry on with the rest of the article once this stuff is covered. - adamstom97 ( talk) 21:54, 25 June 2017 (UTC)
I think that all looks pretty good. Just give that summary a copy-edit and I'll have a look over the rest of the article. - adamstom97 ( talk) 05:19, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
I am starting from the beginning of the article again. Unfortunately, it looks like your copy-editor hasn't done a great job of making sure the article is well written and sensical, which is a big part of GA. I'll do my best to help fix that now, but there is still a lot of this article written in poor English.
My bad. Done. Jhenderson 777 00:13, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
Let me know if there are any problems with these points. - adamstom97 ( talk) 23:06, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
@ Jhenderson777: Sorry for the long wait, I've been busy of late and this slipped my mind. Firstly, a few things that I have found just going over the article again:
Other than those, the article is looking pretty good. Referencing is fine, cosplay image is fine. The other three images could do with better rationales for being used—you need to convince the strictest editors that you have a good reason to include those. Sort those things out and we'll probably be good to go. - adamstom97 ( talk) 00:26, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
Is it really notable to be listed 7th out of a list of 10?
Gwen Stacy's Spider-Woman was named number seven in a list of the best Spider-Men by Newsarama.[45]
I thought maybe it could be improved by adding context and mentioning that the list was published in March 2016 and the character was relatively new but the very next sentence has a list from April 2016 calling her the 2nd greatest alt-Spidey. I suggest dropping this faint praise entirely as it is counter-productive. -- 109.77.209.152 ( talk) 02:50, 14 October 2018 (UTC)
Aren´t the reviews a bit one-sided? The character might have gotten mostly positive reviews but it´shard to believe there was no negative criticism anywhere. 77.179.172.214 ( talk) 11:33, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
One or more images currently used in this article have been nominated for deletion as violations of the non-free content criteria (NFCC).
You can read more about what this means and why these files are being nominated for deletion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Comics#Image deletion nominations for NFCC 8 and 3a.
You can participate at the deletion discussion(s) at Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2020 May 4. If you are not familiar with NFCC-related deletion discussions, I recommend reading the post linked above first.
Sincerely, The Squirrel Conspiracy ( talk) 06:53, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
This article is duplicated here: https://wikipedia.org/wiki/spider-gwen 2806:2F0:51E0:5748:11F0:250E:41B5:80B4 ( talk) 13:13, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
Gwen but and alternate version appears first to my knowledge in “The Amazing Spider-man” series 68.100.230.171 ( talk) 13:54, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
Last I checked, Spider-Gwen/Ghost-Spider's name was more-or-less consistently spelled "Gwendolyn Stacy" without an e, both by her creators and all but one subsequent writer. 2001:569:F875:3D00:210E:D96F:44F7:8C1E ( talk) 2001:569:F875:3D00:210E:D96F:44F7:8C1E ( talk) 03:04, 10 September 2023 (UTC)