![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
The result of the move request was: moved. Note the category and template need renaming, but I wasn't sure what the correct term was. Jenks24 ( talk) 04:30, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Sphenodontia →
Rhynchocephalia – My rationales are:
1. The name Rhynchocephalia (Günther, 1867) has priority over the name Sphenodontia (Williston, 1925).
2. Both names aren't phylogenetically defunct, and have different definitions (so they can't be synonymous).
3. Rhynchocephalia is more inclusive than Sphenodontia, and the former contains the later.
4. Although Sphenodontia is used more often, it is probably due to the fact that only some analyses include Gephyrosaurus as an ingroup taxon, and Rhynchocephalia currently composed only of Gephyrosaurus and Sphenodontia.
5. Other reptiles (not related to Sphenodon, such as
rhynchosaurs) were removed a long time ago from Rhynchocephalia. (although I think we should discuss the complex history of Rhynchocephalia somewhere).
Relisting and notifying
WT:AAR.
Favonian (
talk) 14:41, 24 May 2012 (UTC).
Rnnsh (
talk)
08:35, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
There appears to be an overlap between genus names of a reptile and an insect as Opisthodontia is properly cited but the wikipedia article it links to is a type of Moth.
As far as I know, there are now considered to be fairly undoubtedly two species of tuatara, and the claim that there is only one species conflicts with the Tuatara article. ~ Lord Marcellus 18:23, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
While the English articles have been merged successfully, there are links in other languages only pointing to one of the wikidata items (like Czech). When I tried to merge using the Merge Gadget or Special:Merge, I encountered a conflict regarding French wiki, but it already has a redirect. Therefore I request help of some more experienced editors to complete the merge. It has been resolved that Rhynchocephalia and Sphenodontia are one and the same, as acknowledged by the English and French wikis, but it still has two separate wikidata items and several other translations point to one of the two versions. In other words, the problem is that it has two wikidata items, with roughly half of the translations pointing to one item (Rhynchocephalia) and the other half to the other item (Sphenodontia), while it is one and the same. The problem seems to be the French wiki, but it has a redirect. I have been unable to do the merge myself, so I ask here for help. Vít Matějíček ( talk) 18:23, 14 March 2018 (UTC)
Hemiauchenia since you have been editing this I will just comment and leave it to you. The Phylogram by DeMar et al 2022 is not very good, is too large for the page and covers many irrelevant taxa. The CI and RI are excessively low and the whole thing collapsed under bootstrap. Only one clade has a Bremer of 1 the rest are either around 0.5. Yes I have the paper. I would suggest a simplified phylogeny based on more reliable material. The DeMar paper was aiming to describe a new taxon from the USA not really delve into the topic of this Wiki Page and over the course of time his species will be either accepted or rejected by science (most likely after extensive revision by others), but it shouldnt really be on this page. You can certainly simplify the more ancestral linneages that are not directly related to the TuaTara and its close relatives. Just a suggestion the current phylogeny looks bad. Cheers Scott Thomson (Faendalimas) talk 19:12, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
once apont time the was a big snake in the river .the snake eat many people that fetch water in the river.and one day the was biggest Ven for animals they operate the snake and they found 300 people and they did not survive all of them I thank you 41.114.180.18 ( talk) 14:08, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
The result of the move request was: moved. Note the category and template need renaming, but I wasn't sure what the correct term was. Jenks24 ( talk) 04:30, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Sphenodontia →
Rhynchocephalia – My rationales are:
1. The name Rhynchocephalia (Günther, 1867) has priority over the name Sphenodontia (Williston, 1925).
2. Both names aren't phylogenetically defunct, and have different definitions (so they can't be synonymous).
3. Rhynchocephalia is more inclusive than Sphenodontia, and the former contains the later.
4. Although Sphenodontia is used more often, it is probably due to the fact that only some analyses include Gephyrosaurus as an ingroup taxon, and Rhynchocephalia currently composed only of Gephyrosaurus and Sphenodontia.
5. Other reptiles (not related to Sphenodon, such as
rhynchosaurs) were removed a long time ago from Rhynchocephalia. (although I think we should discuss the complex history of Rhynchocephalia somewhere).
Relisting and notifying
WT:AAR.
Favonian (
talk) 14:41, 24 May 2012 (UTC).
Rnnsh (
talk)
08:35, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
There appears to be an overlap between genus names of a reptile and an insect as Opisthodontia is properly cited but the wikipedia article it links to is a type of Moth.
As far as I know, there are now considered to be fairly undoubtedly two species of tuatara, and the claim that there is only one species conflicts with the Tuatara article. ~ Lord Marcellus 18:23, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
While the English articles have been merged successfully, there are links in other languages only pointing to one of the wikidata items (like Czech). When I tried to merge using the Merge Gadget or Special:Merge, I encountered a conflict regarding French wiki, but it already has a redirect. Therefore I request help of some more experienced editors to complete the merge. It has been resolved that Rhynchocephalia and Sphenodontia are one and the same, as acknowledged by the English and French wikis, but it still has two separate wikidata items and several other translations point to one of the two versions. In other words, the problem is that it has two wikidata items, with roughly half of the translations pointing to one item (Rhynchocephalia) and the other half to the other item (Sphenodontia), while it is one and the same. The problem seems to be the French wiki, but it has a redirect. I have been unable to do the merge myself, so I ask here for help. Vít Matějíček ( talk) 18:23, 14 March 2018 (UTC)
Hemiauchenia since you have been editing this I will just comment and leave it to you. The Phylogram by DeMar et al 2022 is not very good, is too large for the page and covers many irrelevant taxa. The CI and RI are excessively low and the whole thing collapsed under bootstrap. Only one clade has a Bremer of 1 the rest are either around 0.5. Yes I have the paper. I would suggest a simplified phylogeny based on more reliable material. The DeMar paper was aiming to describe a new taxon from the USA not really delve into the topic of this Wiki Page and over the course of time his species will be either accepted or rejected by science (most likely after extensive revision by others), but it shouldnt really be on this page. You can certainly simplify the more ancestral linneages that are not directly related to the TuaTara and its close relatives. Just a suggestion the current phylogeny looks bad. Cheers Scott Thomson (Faendalimas) talk 19:12, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
once apont time the was a big snake in the river .the snake eat many people that fetch water in the river.and one day the was biggest Ven for animals they operate the snake and they found 300 people and they did not survive all of them I thank you 41.114.180.18 ( talk) 14:08, 1 June 2024 (UTC)