From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer:
Auntieruth55 (
talk ·
contribs)
17:37, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
reply
-
GA review (see
here for what the criteria are, and
here for what they are not)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose, spelling, and grammar):
b (
MoS for
lead,
layout,
word choice,
fiction, and
lists):
- It is factually accurate and
verifiable.
- a (
reference section):
b (citations to
reliable sources):
c (
OR):
d (
copyvio and
plagiarism):
- Checked with Eargwig's Copy vio detector. 17.4%--refers back to sources credited, and key words and phrases. Nothing I found extraordinary.
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (
major aspects):
b (
focused):
- It follows the
neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by
images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have
fair use rationales):
b (
appropriate use with
suitable captions):
- Nicely done, and I commend you on your persistence with this and
Spanish conquest of Honduras
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
-
auntieruth
(talk)
17:46, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
reply