This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
SpaceX CRS-1 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
![]() | This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
![]() | A news item involving SpaceX CRS-1 was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 8 October 2012. | ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Dragon CRS-1 merged to Dragon C3 on 2012-06-01.
ORBCOMM is saying that due to the anomaly in Engine 1, the second stage could not complete the second burn for placement of their prototype in the proper orbit.
The OG2 prototype satellite, flying as a secondary payload on this mission, was separated from the Falcon 9 launch vehicle at approximately 9:00 pm EST. However, due to an anomaly on one of the Falcon 9’s first stage engines, the rocket did not comply with a pre-planned International Space Station (ISS) safety gate to allow it to execute the second burn. For this reason, the OG2 prototype satellite was deployed into an orbit that was lower than intended. ORBCOMM and Sierra Nevada Corporation engineers have been in contact with the satellite and are working to determine if and the extent to which the orbit can be raised to an operational orbit using the satellite’s on-board propulsion system.
— ORBCOMM
-- WingtipvorteX PTT ∅ 17:59, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
With all the buzz about the ice cream, should we include information about it? It seems like it could be a controversial addition to the article, so I'd prefer to have consensus for adding it before it is done. -- WingtipvorteX PTT ∅ 20:06, 12 October 2012 (UTC)
Dragon's hatch was closed at about 18:00 UTC (11:00 PST) on 27 October 2012.
Dragon was released at 13:29 UTC (06:29 PST) on 28 October 2012.
Dragon splashed down at 19:22 UTC (12:22 PST) on 28 October 2012.
Dragon was retrieved from the ocean by the American Islander.
Dragon arrived at the Port of Los Angeles on 30 October 2012. ( http://spaceflightnow.com/falcon9/004/121030port/)
-- Craigboy ( talk) 14:20, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
It's 2016, and section "Remainder of mission (11 to 28 October)" (2012) is still in future tense. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
89.75.41.170 (
talk) 23:16, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
SpaceX CRS-1 spent roughly 18 days attached at the International Space Station, which is the longest amount of time for any American spacecraft. STS-123, which previously held the duration record, was attached to the ISS for only 11 days and 20 hours.-- Craigboy ( talk) 00:34, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
http://www.spaceflightnow.com/falcon9/004/121114anomalies/#.UKVmI4b0bKh
http://www.nasa.gov/pdf/707197main_Suffredini_ISS_NAC_20121114.pdf
http://www.aviationweek.com/Blogs.aspx?plckBlogId=Blog:04ce340e-4b63-4d23-9695-d49ab661f385&plckPostId=Blog%3A04ce340e-4b63-4d23-9695-d49ab661f385Post%3Aa8b87703-93f9-4cdf-885f-9429605e14df -- Craigboy ( talk) 04:09, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
https://www.aviationweek.com/Blogs.aspx?plckBlogId=Blog:04ce340e-4b63-4d23-9695-d49ab661f385&plckPostId=Blog:04ce340e-4b63-4d23-9695-d49ab661f385Post:929ec15c-3c9e-4e8d-b3db-bf0f65af09ad -- Craigboy ( talk) 15:13, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: Withdrawn by nominator after considering pertinent responses from fellow editors — JFG talk 10:31, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
– The naming of Dragon missions is an anomaly compared to all the other unmanned spaceflights to the ISS, or even to all spaceflights, which usually bear the name of the spacecraft, not the manufacturer or LSP. See Progress M-29M, Kounotori 5, Cygnus CRS OA-6, etc. This would improve the clarity in lists of spaceflights such as {{ Orbital launches in 2015}} or ISS#Scheduled missions. We don't launch a Korolev, we launch a Progress. We don't launch an Orbital, we launch a Cygnus. We don't launch a SpaceX, we launch a Dragon. — JFG talk 10:21, 18 August 2016 (UTC) --Relisting. No such user ( talk) 10:04, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on SpaceX CRS-1. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 08:52, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
SpaceX CRS-1 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
![]() | This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
![]() | A news item involving SpaceX CRS-1 was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 8 October 2012. | ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Dragon CRS-1 merged to Dragon C3 on 2012-06-01.
ORBCOMM is saying that due to the anomaly in Engine 1, the second stage could not complete the second burn for placement of their prototype in the proper orbit.
The OG2 prototype satellite, flying as a secondary payload on this mission, was separated from the Falcon 9 launch vehicle at approximately 9:00 pm EST. However, due to an anomaly on one of the Falcon 9’s first stage engines, the rocket did not comply with a pre-planned International Space Station (ISS) safety gate to allow it to execute the second burn. For this reason, the OG2 prototype satellite was deployed into an orbit that was lower than intended. ORBCOMM and Sierra Nevada Corporation engineers have been in contact with the satellite and are working to determine if and the extent to which the orbit can be raised to an operational orbit using the satellite’s on-board propulsion system.
— ORBCOMM
-- WingtipvorteX PTT ∅ 17:59, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
With all the buzz about the ice cream, should we include information about it? It seems like it could be a controversial addition to the article, so I'd prefer to have consensus for adding it before it is done. -- WingtipvorteX PTT ∅ 20:06, 12 October 2012 (UTC)
Dragon's hatch was closed at about 18:00 UTC (11:00 PST) on 27 October 2012.
Dragon was released at 13:29 UTC (06:29 PST) on 28 October 2012.
Dragon splashed down at 19:22 UTC (12:22 PST) on 28 October 2012.
Dragon was retrieved from the ocean by the American Islander.
Dragon arrived at the Port of Los Angeles on 30 October 2012. ( http://spaceflightnow.com/falcon9/004/121030port/)
-- Craigboy ( talk) 14:20, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
It's 2016, and section "Remainder of mission (11 to 28 October)" (2012) is still in future tense. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
89.75.41.170 (
talk) 23:16, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
SpaceX CRS-1 spent roughly 18 days attached at the International Space Station, which is the longest amount of time for any American spacecraft. STS-123, which previously held the duration record, was attached to the ISS for only 11 days and 20 hours.-- Craigboy ( talk) 00:34, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
http://www.spaceflightnow.com/falcon9/004/121114anomalies/#.UKVmI4b0bKh
http://www.nasa.gov/pdf/707197main_Suffredini_ISS_NAC_20121114.pdf
http://www.aviationweek.com/Blogs.aspx?plckBlogId=Blog:04ce340e-4b63-4d23-9695-d49ab661f385&plckPostId=Blog%3A04ce340e-4b63-4d23-9695-d49ab661f385Post%3Aa8b87703-93f9-4cdf-885f-9429605e14df -- Craigboy ( talk) 04:09, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
https://www.aviationweek.com/Blogs.aspx?plckBlogId=Blog:04ce340e-4b63-4d23-9695-d49ab661f385&plckPostId=Blog:04ce340e-4b63-4d23-9695-d49ab661f385Post:929ec15c-3c9e-4e8d-b3db-bf0f65af09ad -- Craigboy ( talk) 15:13, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: Withdrawn by nominator after considering pertinent responses from fellow editors — JFG talk 10:31, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
– The naming of Dragon missions is an anomaly compared to all the other unmanned spaceflights to the ISS, or even to all spaceflights, which usually bear the name of the spacecraft, not the manufacturer or LSP. See Progress M-29M, Kounotori 5, Cygnus CRS OA-6, etc. This would improve the clarity in lists of spaceflights such as {{ Orbital launches in 2015}} or ISS#Scheduled missions. We don't launch a Korolev, we launch a Progress. We don't launch an Orbital, we launch a Cygnus. We don't launch a SpaceX, we launch a Dragon. — JFG talk 10:21, 18 August 2016 (UTC) --Relisting. No such user ( talk) 10:04, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on SpaceX CRS-1. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 08:52, 11 November 2017 (UTC)