 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
 | On 18 October 2022, it was proposed that this article be moved to Soyuz-2.1v. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
Shouldn't the article be named "Soyuz-2.1v" instead of "Soyuz-2-1v"? That's the spelling I'm seeing on all the Russian references. -- IanOsgood ( talk) 14:44, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
- The two designations are used interchangeably for the other Soyuz-2 configurations. The manufacturer uses a hyphen so I'd tend to go with that. -- W. D. Graham 15:49, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
Will there be a second flight? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.229.245.179 ( talk) 08:17, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
Should this article be combined with the rest of the Soyuz 2.1a/b/ST article? It’s still in that family, sharing launch facilities, tooling and design features. Is there a compelling reason to keep it separate? Blastr42 ( talk) 01:33, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
- No, this rocket is too different. It's a repurposed Soyuz center core, with a different engine and structural reinforcements. Our article calls it a "heavily modified derivative". Naming is alas misleading; wish they had kept the "Soyuz-1" development name. — JFG talk 01:10, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: no consensus. ( closed by non-admin page mover) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mello hi! ( 投稿) 18:59, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
Soyuz-2-1v → Soyuz-2.1v – The article text uses a decimal between the numbers, as does the corresponding page on ru.wiki. Hellbus ( talk) 23:31, 17 October 2022 (UTC) This is a contested technical request ( permalink). – Ammarpad ( talk) 06:57, 18 October 2022 (UTC) — Relisting. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 18:38, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
- @
Hellbus: Discussion needed as most sources in article seem to use "Soyuz-2-1v" and article text seemed to have been mass changed in a series of edits by
User:Michael60634 (see revision
here) on 6 June 2020.
Happily888 (
talk)
01:03, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
- @
Happily888:Russian-language sources cited in the article use a dot, not a dash. Other Soyuz models (e.g. Soyuz-2.1a and -2.1b) use a dot as well.
Hellbus (
talk)
02:02, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
- @
Hellbus: The citing in the article might use a dot, but many of the references were changed from dashes to dots in
this edit by
User:CRS-20 in August 2020.
- Clicking on the references show that the majority of them do use "Soyuz-2-1v", see: [1], [2] or [3] as examples. Also, the manufacturer's website uses the dash form, see source: [4]. Happily888 ( talk) 04:32, 18 October 2022 (UTC); edited 04:49, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
- @
Hellbus: The citing in the article might use a dot, but many of the references were changed from dashes to dots in
this edit by
User:CRS-20 in August 2020.
- @
Happily888:Russian-language sources cited in the article use a dot, not a dash. Other Soyuz models (e.g. Soyuz-2.1a and -2.1b) use a dot as well.
Hellbus (
talk)
02:02, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
- Start-Class spaceflight articles
- Unknown-importance spaceflight articles
- WikiProject Spaceflight articles
- Start-Class Rocketry articles
- Unknown-importance Rocketry articles
- WikiProject Rocketry articles
- Start-Class Russia articles
- Unknown-importance Russia articles
- Unknown-importance Start-Class Russia articles
- WikiProject Russia articles with no associated task force
- WikiProject Russia articles
|
| This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| On 18 October 2022, it was proposed that this article be moved to Soyuz-2.1v. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
Shouldn't the article be named "Soyuz-2.1v" instead of "Soyuz-2-1v"? That's the spelling I'm seeing on all the Russian references. -- IanOsgood ( talk) 14:44, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
- The two designations are used interchangeably for the other Soyuz-2 configurations. The manufacturer uses a hyphen so I'd tend to go with that. -- W. D. Graham 15:49, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
Will there be a second flight? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.229.245.179 ( talk) 08:17, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
Should this article be combined with the rest of the Soyuz 2.1a/b/ST article? It’s still in that family, sharing launch facilities, tooling and design features. Is there a compelling reason to keep it separate? Blastr42 ( talk) 01:33, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
- No, this rocket is too different. It's a repurposed Soyuz center core, with a different engine and structural reinforcements. Our article calls it a "heavily modified derivative". Naming is alas misleading; wish they had kept the "Soyuz-1" development name. — JFG talk 01:10, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: no consensus. ( closed by non-admin page mover) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mello hi! ( 投稿) 18:59, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
Soyuz-2-1v → Soyuz-2.1v – The article text uses a decimal between the numbers, as does the corresponding page on ru.wiki. Hellbus ( talk) 23:31, 17 October 2022 (UTC) This is a contested technical request ( permalink). – Ammarpad ( talk) 06:57, 18 October 2022 (UTC) — Relisting. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 18:38, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
- @
Hellbus: Discussion needed as most sources in article seem to use "Soyuz-2-1v" and article text seemed to have been mass changed in a series of edits by
User:Michael60634 (see revision
here) on 6 June 2020.
Happily888 (
talk)
01:03, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
- @
Happily888:Russian-language sources cited in the article use a dot, not a dash. Other Soyuz models (e.g. Soyuz-2.1a and -2.1b) use a dot as well.
Hellbus (
talk)
02:02, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
- @
Hellbus: The citing in the article might use a dot, but many of the references were changed from dashes to dots in
this edit by
User:CRS-20 in August 2020.
- Clicking on the references show that the majority of them do use "Soyuz-2-1v", see: [1], [2] or [3] as examples. Also, the manufacturer's website uses the dash form, see source: [4]. Happily888 ( talk) 04:32, 18 October 2022 (UTC); edited 04:49, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
- @
Hellbus: The citing in the article might use a dot, but many of the references were changed from dashes to dots in
this edit by
User:CRS-20 in August 2020.
- @
Happily888:Russian-language sources cited in the article use a dot, not a dash. Other Soyuz models (e.g. Soyuz-2.1a and -2.1b) use a dot as well.
Hellbus (
talk)
02:02, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
- Start-Class spaceflight articles
- Unknown-importance spaceflight articles
- WikiProject Spaceflight articles
- Start-Class Rocketry articles
- Unknown-importance Rocketry articles
- WikiProject Rocketry articles
- Start-Class Russia articles
- Unknown-importance Russia articles
- Unknown-importance Start-Class Russia articles
- WikiProject Russia articles with no associated task force
- WikiProject Russia articles