This article is within the scope of WikiProject Soviet Union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Soviet UnionWikipedia:WikiProject Soviet UnionTemplate:WikiProject Soviet UnionSoviet Union articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all
Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please
join the project, or contribute to the
project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the
full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a
list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the
full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: rejected by
BorgQueen (
talk) 10:46, 17 April 2023 (UTC)reply
... that the K-68, a Soviet-era submarine, could carry
nuclear warheads, posing a significant threat during the peak of the
Cold War? Source: Vilches Alarcón, pp. 12, 18, 22; Polmar & Noot, p. 289
Overall: @
ULPS: Good article but the hook isn't that interesting. There are many submarines that hold nukes with many still around today. So that doesn't exactly make the hook any special so a new one should be proposed.
Onegreatjoke (
talk) 20:00, 24 March 2023 (UTC)reply
ULPS seems to have been active, but has not made an attempt to propose a new hook – should probably close this one up.
theleekycauldron (
talk •
contribs) (she/her) 02:33, 13 April 2023 (UTC)reply
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Soviet Union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Soviet UnionWikipedia:WikiProject Soviet UnionTemplate:WikiProject Soviet UnionSoviet Union articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all
Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please
join the project, or contribute to the
project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the
full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a
list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the
full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: rejected by
BorgQueen (
talk) 10:46, 17 April 2023 (UTC)reply
... that the K-68, a Soviet-era submarine, could carry
nuclear warheads, posing a significant threat during the peak of the
Cold War? Source: Vilches Alarcón, pp. 12, 18, 22; Polmar & Noot, p. 289
Overall: @
ULPS: Good article but the hook isn't that interesting. There are many submarines that hold nukes with many still around today. So that doesn't exactly make the hook any special so a new one should be proposed.
Onegreatjoke (
talk) 20:00, 24 March 2023 (UTC)reply
ULPS seems to have been active, but has not made an attempt to propose a new hook – should probably close this one up.
theleekycauldron (
talk •
contribs) (she/her) 02:33, 13 April 2023 (UTC)reply