![]() | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I read in a book a long time ago that said that between 1941-1942 sometime Hitler got a report from a general saying that the Bolsheviks produced 800 tanks/month. Not very important, but interesting! BL 15:24, 27 Sep 2003 (UTC)
This article is very interesting. I also like how it is layed out. Wikipedia is the perfect setting for such obscure, interesting masses of information. Kingturtle 16:37, 12 Dec 2003 (UTC)
MWAK
Regarding the tables, wouldn't it be better if instead of being in HTML markup, they were in Wiki markup? This is a Wiki, after all -- Cabalamat 22:41, 10 May 2004 (UTC)
Two errors have been made: the figures for the T34/76 simply don't add up (at least not to the given total :o) as the 1944 number was counted twice; and in the 1945 T-34/85 number the "21" should be "12". Are the 1945 numbers supposed to be of the full year?
-- MWAK 08:57, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
I see the numbers are those of Jane's' Tanks of World War II. That book is a nice effort, full of information not published elsewhere, but sadly full of mistakes also (including oldies like the Dutch buying two FT-17's and Belgium ordering 25 AMC 35's). Should you doubt the 21,000 number is among them, consulting Zaloga's T-34/85 will soon make you understand that whatever the insecurities about the true figures, any number above 14,000 is utterly impossible. But now at least my question is answered: the numbers are those of the first eight months :o).
-- MWAK 07:29, 28 August 2005 (UTC)
I'd like put in some work on this article, including the following subjects:
I'd also like to remove the detailed descriptions of the vehicles. This article only needs an accurate description of each one's role (e.g., the KV-2 heavy assault tank was essentially an assault gun). Of course, more details can be mentioned where they are relevant to the subject of production.
Any comments? — Michael Z. 2005-12-11 00:26 Z
It might be useful to list locations of building plants. I know it might be reasnaiobly complicated to list lcoations, tank types and dates, but if anyone has any information on this I'd appreciate very much if something could be put into the article? Thanks! Same for the other countries during the war also. SpookyMulder 12:30, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
The very first sentence in this article describes production as simply "large". Perhaps a better way could be found to write an opening sentence... how large is 'large'? :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.1.2.18 ( talk) 19:53, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I read in a book a long time ago that said that between 1941-1942 sometime Hitler got a report from a general saying that the Bolsheviks produced 800 tanks/month. Not very important, but interesting! BL 15:24, 27 Sep 2003 (UTC)
This article is very interesting. I also like how it is layed out. Wikipedia is the perfect setting for such obscure, interesting masses of information. Kingturtle 16:37, 12 Dec 2003 (UTC)
MWAK
Regarding the tables, wouldn't it be better if instead of being in HTML markup, they were in Wiki markup? This is a Wiki, after all -- Cabalamat 22:41, 10 May 2004 (UTC)
Two errors have been made: the figures for the T34/76 simply don't add up (at least not to the given total :o) as the 1944 number was counted twice; and in the 1945 T-34/85 number the "21" should be "12". Are the 1945 numbers supposed to be of the full year?
-- MWAK 08:57, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
I see the numbers are those of Jane's' Tanks of World War II. That book is a nice effort, full of information not published elsewhere, but sadly full of mistakes also (including oldies like the Dutch buying two FT-17's and Belgium ordering 25 AMC 35's). Should you doubt the 21,000 number is among them, consulting Zaloga's T-34/85 will soon make you understand that whatever the insecurities about the true figures, any number above 14,000 is utterly impossible. But now at least my question is answered: the numbers are those of the first eight months :o).
-- MWAK 07:29, 28 August 2005 (UTC)
I'd like put in some work on this article, including the following subjects:
I'd also like to remove the detailed descriptions of the vehicles. This article only needs an accurate description of each one's role (e.g., the KV-2 heavy assault tank was essentially an assault gun). Of course, more details can be mentioned where they are relevant to the subject of production.
Any comments? — Michael Z. 2005-12-11 00:26 Z
It might be useful to list locations of building plants. I know it might be reasnaiobly complicated to list lcoations, tank types and dates, but if anyone has any information on this I'd appreciate very much if something could be put into the article? Thanks! Same for the other countries during the war also. SpookyMulder 12:30, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
The very first sentence in this article describes production as simply "large". Perhaps a better way could be found to write an opening sentence... how large is 'large'? :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.1.2.18 ( talk) 19:53, 1 October 2014 (UTC)