 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=logo}
The Map provided is very misleading. Surely there is one that would be more accurate and in public domain? User:SatuSuro 10:05, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
- Accepted alternatives? come another one, this is not a computer game! SatuSuro 07:45, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
A close check of this article needs to be followed up - too many adjectives of unencylopediac nature, regardless of whether the features encourage such enthusiasm SatuSuro 07:56, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
Because there is now a separate article that has been created at South West Tasmania that is dealing with the region - this article is about to be reduced to specifically tie in with the south west national park article - over generalised non encyclopdiac information in this article will be removed. Satu Suro 12:50, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
- Tagged merge to South West Tasmania. This article lacks inline citations to verify the claims made. If all the peacockery and unverifiable claims are removed there will be a little bit left to work into the above article. As the subject of this article is so poorly defined I believe it is not notable and content merged. I haven't found many references to "South West Wilderness" outside this article apart from one tourism website of doubtful reliability. Bleakcomb ( talk) 06:30, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
|
| This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||
The Map provided is very misleading. Surely there is one that would be more accurate and in public domain? User:SatuSuro 10:05, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
- Accepted alternatives? come another one, this is not a computer game! SatuSuro 07:45, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
A close check of this article needs to be followed up - too many adjectives of unencylopediac nature, regardless of whether the features encourage such enthusiasm SatuSuro 07:56, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
Because there is now a separate article that has been created at South West Tasmania that is dealing with the region - this article is about to be reduced to specifically tie in with the south west national park article - over generalised non encyclopdiac information in this article will be removed. Satu Suro 12:50, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
- Tagged merge to South West Tasmania. This article lacks inline citations to verify the claims made. If all the peacockery and unverifiable claims are removed there will be a little bit left to work into the above article. As the subject of this article is so poorly defined I believe it is not notable and content merged. I haven't found many references to "South West Wilderness" outside this article apart from one tourism website of doubtful reliability. Bleakcomb ( talk) 06:30, 1 May 2010 (UTC)