![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 |
Firstly, you cannot enlarge non-free images from its original size unless you have the copyright claimant's permission to do so, under number 3b at WP:NFCC: "An entire work is not used if a portion will suffice. Low- rather than high-resolution/fidelity/bit rate is used (especially where the original could be used for deliberate copyright infringement). This rule also applies to the copy in the File: namespace." Citing The Simpsons as an example isn't really gonna help your case as it clearly violates this site's policy regarding fair-use images. per WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Granted, I'm going to revert that image in The Simpsons back to its original size. Secondly, "bizarre adventures" sounds in-universe language; "exploits" is much more neutral. Slightlymad ( talk ⋅ contribs) 05:19, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
@ Aspects: since you won't start the discussion, I'll go ahead and do that myself. The image is of exceptionally low quality and thus, regardless of how long it has been in the article, should be removed. There is not a single good article that I know of that has an image of this horrendous quality. If you can obtain an image with a quality similar to that of the "Quintuplets 2000", please upload it under a non-free license and insert it in the article, otherwise this needs to go. Musicfan122 ( talk) 08:16, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
(outdent) Thank you for your work here, Samuel Wiki, but it looks like our counterpart has been blocked. Aspects ( talk) 03:24, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 01:13, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request to
South Park has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
In the syndication section, there should be a space between "In 2019" and the sources before it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.2.148.124 ( talk)
It's me again. I just noticed that the last source in the syndication section is the only source that's a bare link, can somebody fix that please? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.2.148.158 ( talk • contribs) 18:35, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
An user has reverted three times in favor of his own text, which has a sentence that reads that the show "satirizes [certain topics] towards a mature audience", which I reckon is horrible syntax. In order to avoid edit warring (which they could already be reported for), I'll just ignore the thing for the time being, but I'm leaving it here for everyone to weigh in. -- uKER ( talk) 12:32, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether Portal:South Park is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The page will be discussed at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:South Park (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the page during the discussion, including to improve the page to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the deletion notice from the top of the page. North America 1000 13:31, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
As of season 23 (and perhaps season 22), Randy has replaced the four boys as the main character, so can someone edit the description to change that?
83.90.182.155 ( talk) 22:11, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
QuestFour, Dan Wescher - What's going on with all of the recent back-and-forth reverting that you two have been engaging in here? It looks like there's a dispute over this article's genre and whether or not it should be classified as an adult cartoon? Instead of edit warring over this, do you two mind joining this discussion, talking about what's going on, and helping me to work this out? I don't want to see this editing dispute continue over the article, and I don't want to see this escalate when it doesn't need to. Also, Dan Wescher, what's with this edit you made to QuestFour's user talk page? Instead of leaving that kind of a message, that was a perfect opportunity that you could've taken to civilly discuss this dispute and work things out in a cordial manner... Thanks in advance. :-) ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 18:57, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The main image on this article is a third party, fan-made image that does not originate from the show, and the characters designs are completely wrong. The image used to represent the show should be accurate to what the show looks like, not a fan made reproduction image. This should be an easy fix, it should be either the title card, or something like this image, https://www.deviantart.com/zizigolllo/art/south-park-logo-517617589, which contains the official South Park font and the four main characters, and might replace the current image. Anything would be better than what it currently is.
Dthompson19 ( talk) 02:05, 17 August 2020 (UTC)Dthompson19
In one season (I can't remember which) that was a title image. This a great show anyway — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:2BB1:2EC0:58C2:10D6:8E95:DDB5 ( talk) 19:52, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
The page should classify this as adult animation. Even the categories say it's adult animated. — ÐW ( talk/ contribs) 23:29, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
What's with all this "consensus" talk? — ÐW ( talk/ contribs) 17:49, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
Adult Animation ShakeZula2000 ( talk) 23:18, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
Dick Figures is NOT a South Park spin-off P/ K/ L. inc ( talk) 15:01, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect
Tardicaca shark. The discussion will occur at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 30#Tardicaca shark until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.
Hog Farm
Talk
22:53, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Considering what would presumably be an army of logged in users able to edit, one would think that "Complete seasons of South Park have been regularly released on their entirety on DVD" would be caught. 96.240.128.124 ( talk) 14:38, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Pretty much all of the content in the section "Franchise" is near-identical if not an exact copy of information and text in the article South Park (franchise). I realize that there is a hatnote at the top of the section redirecting to this article, but for the most part, I think the entire text of the section doesn't even need to exist. We can keep the hatnote about the video games since it references another article, but outside of that, just have the hatnote for the the franchise article and leave it at that. Anyone object to this or have other ideas? -- SanAnMan ( talk) 22:23, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
Please see discussion at Talk:List of South Park episodes#Post Covid. -- Thibaut ( talk) 15:08, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
shouldn't the disclaimer be capitalized as seen in the show? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kermitisawesome ( talk • contribs) 21:10, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
I've noticed that over the past couple days, virtually every mention of Tolkien Black from his many previous appearances have been rewritten to appear as though his name has always been that. I agree that his section on the List of Characters should reflect the name change, though is it necessary to retcon the prior episode & season pages in which his name was canonically "Token"? BOTTO ( T• C) 22:47, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
At the time of writing, the last sentence of the Syndication section currently states, "In 2019, CBS Television Distribution (the syndication arm of ViacomCBS, now known as Paramount Global the parent company of Comedy Central), took over..."
The parentheses in this sentence is missing a comma and worded in a clunky manner. I instead propose changing the parentheses above to, "(the syndication arm of Paramount Global, the parent company of Comedy Central)".
I also propose that the proper noun "Paramount Global" be linked to the article on the corporation here: /info/en/?search=Paramount_Global
Thank you for your consideration.
Patrick Kohn ( talk) 04:14, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect
South ParQ and has thus listed it
for discussion. This discussion will occur at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 May 5#South ParQ until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.
SanAnMan (
talk)
02:20, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
South Park is an adult animated show, so wouldn't it make sense to put "adult" before "animated sitcom" in the first sentence? 172.72.175.178 ( talk) 20:28, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request to
South Park has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Under the category "Voice cast," the name "Token Black" should be changed to "Tolkien Black," as was revealed to be his true name in Season 25 Episode 2. Doormouse1 ( talk) 00:10, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 |
Firstly, you cannot enlarge non-free images from its original size unless you have the copyright claimant's permission to do so, under number 3b at WP:NFCC: "An entire work is not used if a portion will suffice. Low- rather than high-resolution/fidelity/bit rate is used (especially where the original could be used for deliberate copyright infringement). This rule also applies to the copy in the File: namespace." Citing The Simpsons as an example isn't really gonna help your case as it clearly violates this site's policy regarding fair-use images. per WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Granted, I'm going to revert that image in The Simpsons back to its original size. Secondly, "bizarre adventures" sounds in-universe language; "exploits" is much more neutral. Slightlymad ( talk ⋅ contribs) 05:19, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
@ Aspects: since you won't start the discussion, I'll go ahead and do that myself. The image is of exceptionally low quality and thus, regardless of how long it has been in the article, should be removed. There is not a single good article that I know of that has an image of this horrendous quality. If you can obtain an image with a quality similar to that of the "Quintuplets 2000", please upload it under a non-free license and insert it in the article, otherwise this needs to go. Musicfan122 ( talk) 08:16, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
(outdent) Thank you for your work here, Samuel Wiki, but it looks like our counterpart has been blocked. Aspects ( talk) 03:24, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 01:13, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request to
South Park has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
In the syndication section, there should be a space between "In 2019" and the sources before it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.2.148.124 ( talk)
It's me again. I just noticed that the last source in the syndication section is the only source that's a bare link, can somebody fix that please? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.2.148.158 ( talk • contribs) 18:35, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
An user has reverted three times in favor of his own text, which has a sentence that reads that the show "satirizes [certain topics] towards a mature audience", which I reckon is horrible syntax. In order to avoid edit warring (which they could already be reported for), I'll just ignore the thing for the time being, but I'm leaving it here for everyone to weigh in. -- uKER ( talk) 12:32, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether Portal:South Park is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The page will be discussed at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:South Park (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the page during the discussion, including to improve the page to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the deletion notice from the top of the page. North America 1000 13:31, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
As of season 23 (and perhaps season 22), Randy has replaced the four boys as the main character, so can someone edit the description to change that?
83.90.182.155 ( talk) 22:11, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
QuestFour, Dan Wescher - What's going on with all of the recent back-and-forth reverting that you two have been engaging in here? It looks like there's a dispute over this article's genre and whether or not it should be classified as an adult cartoon? Instead of edit warring over this, do you two mind joining this discussion, talking about what's going on, and helping me to work this out? I don't want to see this editing dispute continue over the article, and I don't want to see this escalate when it doesn't need to. Also, Dan Wescher, what's with this edit you made to QuestFour's user talk page? Instead of leaving that kind of a message, that was a perfect opportunity that you could've taken to civilly discuss this dispute and work things out in a cordial manner... Thanks in advance. :-) ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 18:57, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The main image on this article is a third party, fan-made image that does not originate from the show, and the characters designs are completely wrong. The image used to represent the show should be accurate to what the show looks like, not a fan made reproduction image. This should be an easy fix, it should be either the title card, or something like this image, https://www.deviantart.com/zizigolllo/art/south-park-logo-517617589, which contains the official South Park font and the four main characters, and might replace the current image. Anything would be better than what it currently is.
Dthompson19 ( talk) 02:05, 17 August 2020 (UTC)Dthompson19
In one season (I can't remember which) that was a title image. This a great show anyway — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:2BB1:2EC0:58C2:10D6:8E95:DDB5 ( talk) 19:52, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
The page should classify this as adult animation. Even the categories say it's adult animated. — ÐW ( talk/ contribs) 23:29, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
What's with all this "consensus" talk? — ÐW ( talk/ contribs) 17:49, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
Adult Animation ShakeZula2000 ( talk) 23:18, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
Dick Figures is NOT a South Park spin-off P/ K/ L. inc ( talk) 15:01, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect
Tardicaca shark. The discussion will occur at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 30#Tardicaca shark until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.
Hog Farm
Talk
22:53, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Considering what would presumably be an army of logged in users able to edit, one would think that "Complete seasons of South Park have been regularly released on their entirety on DVD" would be caught. 96.240.128.124 ( talk) 14:38, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Pretty much all of the content in the section "Franchise" is near-identical if not an exact copy of information and text in the article South Park (franchise). I realize that there is a hatnote at the top of the section redirecting to this article, but for the most part, I think the entire text of the section doesn't even need to exist. We can keep the hatnote about the video games since it references another article, but outside of that, just have the hatnote for the the franchise article and leave it at that. Anyone object to this or have other ideas? -- SanAnMan ( talk) 22:23, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
Please see discussion at Talk:List of South Park episodes#Post Covid. -- Thibaut ( talk) 15:08, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
shouldn't the disclaimer be capitalized as seen in the show? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kermitisawesome ( talk • contribs) 21:10, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
I've noticed that over the past couple days, virtually every mention of Tolkien Black from his many previous appearances have been rewritten to appear as though his name has always been that. I agree that his section on the List of Characters should reflect the name change, though is it necessary to retcon the prior episode & season pages in which his name was canonically "Token"? BOTTO ( T• C) 22:47, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
At the time of writing, the last sentence of the Syndication section currently states, "In 2019, CBS Television Distribution (the syndication arm of ViacomCBS, now known as Paramount Global the parent company of Comedy Central), took over..."
The parentheses in this sentence is missing a comma and worded in a clunky manner. I instead propose changing the parentheses above to, "(the syndication arm of Paramount Global, the parent company of Comedy Central)".
I also propose that the proper noun "Paramount Global" be linked to the article on the corporation here: /info/en/?search=Paramount_Global
Thank you for your consideration.
Patrick Kohn ( talk) 04:14, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect
South ParQ and has thus listed it
for discussion. This discussion will occur at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 May 5#South ParQ until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.
SanAnMan (
talk)
02:20, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
South Park is an adult animated show, so wouldn't it make sense to put "adult" before "animated sitcom" in the first sentence? 172.72.175.178 ( talk) 20:28, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request to
South Park has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Under the category "Voice cast," the name "Token Black" should be changed to "Tolkien Black," as was revealed to be his true name in Season 25 Episode 2. Doormouse1 ( talk) 00:10, 22 February 2023 (UTC)