This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

United States: Vermont Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Vermont. This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter. Schools This article is related to WikiProject Schools, a collaborative effort to write quality articles about schools around the world. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.SchoolsWikipedia:WikiProject SchoolsTemplate:WikiProject Schoolsschool articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

The school's website https://www.sbschools.net/site/default.aspx?PageType=3&DomainID=4&ModuleInstanceID=16&ViewID=6446EE88-D30C-497E-9316-3F8874B3E108&RenderLoc=0&FlexDataID=13&PageID=1 says that that the "Rebels" name was to be changed as of August 2017. This local article http://www.burlingtonfreepress.com/story/news/local/vermont/2017/06/08/wolves-take-south-burlington/366228001/ says that the new team name, "Wolves", has been approved, not that it has already been changed. Is there any definitive source that says that the name change has already taken place?

Whether the name had already been changed or not, I don't think the name change issue should be erased from the article. This was a relatively high-profile issue that lasted for years. Erasing it from the article is not appropriate. Meters ( talk) 20:07, 9 June 2017 (UTC) reply