This article is written in
British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other
varieties of English. According to the
relevant style guide, this should not be changed without
broad consensus.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following
WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sculpture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Sculpture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SculptureWikipedia:WikiProject SculptureTemplate:WikiProject Sculpturesculpture articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles
A lion in Cambridge, displayed at
Lion Yard (1975 -1999) and at
Cambridge University R.U.F.C. ground since 2014, has been claimed to be a wooden prototype for the cast South Bank Lion. The Cambridge lion was discovered at the Woburn Abbey antique centre, ca 1971. However, the two lions are quite different in form; the Cambridge lion has been described as "emaciated", its stance is different and the tail is turned out rather than hanging between its legs.
The claim is unreferenced. I have flagged it as dubious.
Nedrutland (
talk) 07:30, 7 September 2021 (UTC)reply
This article is written in
British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other
varieties of English. According to the
relevant style guide, this should not be changed without
broad consensus.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following
WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sculpture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Sculpture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SculptureWikipedia:WikiProject SculptureTemplate:WikiProject Sculpturesculpture articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles
A lion in Cambridge, displayed at
Lion Yard (1975 -1999) and at
Cambridge University R.U.F.C. ground since 2014, has been claimed to be a wooden prototype for the cast South Bank Lion. The Cambridge lion was discovered at the Woburn Abbey antique centre, ca 1971. However, the two lions are quite different in form; the Cambridge lion has been described as "emaciated", its stance is different and the tail is turned out rather than hanging between its legs.
The claim is unreferenced. I have flagged it as dubious.
Nedrutland (
talk) 07:30, 7 September 2021 (UTC)reply
