This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Sousse article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
How many inhabitants are there? 3 completely different figures are quoted in the article — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.13.31.29 ( talk) 21:03, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
To make a long story short, please see my comment at Talk:Hadrumetum and respond there if anyone has comments. -- AlexanderVanLoon ( talk) 09:47, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
This section
seems to have nothing whatsoever to do with Hadrumetum or Sousse. Any idea how it could be used with more focus on the topic here? — LlywelynII 15:21, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
This section
in addition to its poor formatting and inclusion of every possible alternate and foreign name for sth we already have a separate article about 1 doesn't say anything about the circus except roughly where it's located and that it was the only ruin known 115 years ago; 2 the second bit isn't incredibly interesting given that a century of archaeology might've uncovered plenty since then and the article already mentions and cites the completeness of the Vandal and Arab destructions of the town; 3, cite or not, it's also patently false since the catacombs were discovered in the year 1903; 4, cites or not, it's also patently self-contradictory since it's claimed the ruin was "known" but then has to reconstruct the position based on aerial photographs which 5 is of course WP:OR of the sort that we can undertake in WP:BLUE cases but can't and shouldn't document as the WP:RS for the information. Surely, if the ruin was known, its location was known as well and can be used from the same source. 7 The number of times a French word appears in a government PDF is not really germane to anything about the city of Sousse. If any of those appearances say something important, then just include that. Last, the page numbers should just be included in the cites in some fashion, not added into the running text of the article itself. — LlywelynII 01:24, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
Lettre 102.25.132.142 ( talk) 20:37, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
among us 178.216.218.9 ( talk) 06:21, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Sousse article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
How many inhabitants are there? 3 completely different figures are quoted in the article — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.13.31.29 ( talk) 21:03, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
To make a long story short, please see my comment at Talk:Hadrumetum and respond there if anyone has comments. -- AlexanderVanLoon ( talk) 09:47, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
This section
seems to have nothing whatsoever to do with Hadrumetum or Sousse. Any idea how it could be used with more focus on the topic here? — LlywelynII 15:21, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
This section
in addition to its poor formatting and inclusion of every possible alternate and foreign name for sth we already have a separate article about 1 doesn't say anything about the circus except roughly where it's located and that it was the only ruin known 115 years ago; 2 the second bit isn't incredibly interesting given that a century of archaeology might've uncovered plenty since then and the article already mentions and cites the completeness of the Vandal and Arab destructions of the town; 3, cite or not, it's also patently false since the catacombs were discovered in the year 1903; 4, cites or not, it's also patently self-contradictory since it's claimed the ruin was "known" but then has to reconstruct the position based on aerial photographs which 5 is of course WP:OR of the sort that we can undertake in WP:BLUE cases but can't and shouldn't document as the WP:RS for the information. Surely, if the ruin was known, its location was known as well and can be used from the same source. 7 The number of times a French word appears in a government PDF is not really germane to anything about the city of Sousse. If any of those appearances say something important, then just include that. Last, the page numbers should just be included in the cites in some fashion, not added into the running text of the article itself. — LlywelynII 01:24, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
Lettre 102.25.132.142 ( talk) 20:37, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
among us 178.216.218.9 ( talk) 06:21, 14 April 2024 (UTC)