| This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Sounds (magazine) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shockingly bad page. John Robb did not come up with the expression "Britpop", and Sounds folded three years before Britop even happened. Sounds was a good paper - it deserves better than this. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.86.50.152 ( talk) 18:48, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
I have a vague recollection that John Robb did indeed coin the term Britpop, but he applied it to the Madchester/baggy bands of the late 80s/early 90s; a coinage that clearly failed to stick. Britpop as applied to bands such as Blur and Oasis was (I think) the work of Stuart Maconie in NME. Matthau ( talk) 04:52, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
What was the ISSN for Sounds? - David Gerard ( talk) 11:11, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
https://www.facebook.com/soundsmag/ Here is the evidence. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.50.127.186 ( talk) 20:10, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
I propose to merge Sounds Obscurist chart into Sounds (magazine). There is practically nothing that can establish independent notability of the former article. A mention of the chart in the magazine article should suffice. - The Gnome ( talk) 10:54, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
- Agree. Ghmyrtle ( talk) 12:35, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
Seem to recall the name of the paper being pronounced "zounds"? Anyone recall this? 85.255.237.48 ( talk) 22:42, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
| This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Sounds (magazine) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
|
| This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shockingly bad page. John Robb did not come up with the expression "Britpop", and Sounds folded three years before Britop even happened. Sounds was a good paper - it deserves better than this. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.86.50.152 ( talk) 18:48, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
I have a vague recollection that John Robb did indeed coin the term Britpop, but he applied it to the Madchester/baggy bands of the late 80s/early 90s; a coinage that clearly failed to stick. Britpop as applied to bands such as Blur and Oasis was (I think) the work of Stuart Maconie in NME. Matthau ( talk) 04:52, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
What was the ISSN for Sounds? - David Gerard ( talk) 11:11, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
https://www.facebook.com/soundsmag/ Here is the evidence. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.50.127.186 ( talk) 20:10, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
I propose to merge Sounds Obscurist chart into Sounds (magazine). There is practically nothing that can establish independent notability of the former article. A mention of the chart in the magazine article should suffice. - The Gnome ( talk) 10:54, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
- Agree. Ghmyrtle ( talk) 12:35, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
Seem to recall the name of the paper being pronounced "zounds"? Anyone recall this? 85.255.237.48 ( talk) 22:42, 7 February 2021 (UTC)