This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Soundboard Prank Call redirect. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Last time I visited this article it was completely different and actually alot more professional sounding than this. It's completely amateurish and doesn't even lend any justice anymore to victims or techniques or anything. Is it possible to revisit the article history and revert it back?
KirkCliff2 ( talk) 01:11, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
KirkCliff2 ( talk) 21:02, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
KirkCliff2 ( talk) 21:40, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
No, my version isn't that much better. But at least it removes most of the unsourced information. Personally, I'm all for simply removing the article altogether and not mentioning soundboard prank calls. You seem to equate my stub – which has literally no information – to your version, which has lots and lots of information that needs to be sourced. That's not a fair assessment and it does not justify your re-inclusion of the material.
You have not resolved any of my concerns, most notably with the good, reliable third party sourcing. The only source you offer is literally a Yahoo Answers-like service in which anonymous non-expert people give their two cents. This does not pass WP:SPS or WP:SELFPUB, and definitely does not pass WP:V and WP:RS.
You accuse me of selectively following certain rules but you have not pointed out which ones I have ignored and which I have followed. Nobody has ever discussed the article before, therefore there is not an established "consensus" to go against. If I went to WP:THIRD right now I'm relatively sure that they would agree with me and not with you. Your WP:IAR is an essay, not a rule, and to be quite frank, IAR is not a trump card for ignoring V, RS, NOR, and BURDEN.
You are the one that insists on restoring the article. The solution is simple. Give me good sources, and I will leave it alone. hbdragon88 ( talk) 03:25, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
This article should be merged with the Prank call article, as this article contains less information than necessary to be a complete article and is basically a category of prank call. -- SuperSmashBros.Brawl777 ( talk) 14:52, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
I agree -- 67.224.22.240 ( talk) 10:35, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
How about mention in the article of the victim soundboards which have become popular in the last year. Popular victims are:
Angry Arab
Angry Black Guy (sometimes Called Other Angry Black Guy)
Angry Elevator Guy (soemtimes called Stuck in the Elevator Guy)
Arnolds Escort
Bait Shop Guy
British Bitch
British Idiot
British Jackarse
Black Guy (sometimes called Angry Black Guy)
Casino Man
Chinaman
Chis the Hacker
Confused Mexican
Crackhead
Crazy Indian Guy
Depressed Guy
Drug and Alcohol Lady
Drunk Guy
Duncan
Epic Crazy Lady
Epic Crazy Lady's Husband
G-Girl
High Redneck
Hotel Jackass
Hotel Spaz
Jackass Plumber
Jeff the Pawn Shop Owner
Massage Lady
Peggy (sometimes called Lady Death)
Philly Thug
Pig Sex Lady
Pissed Off Waitress
Racist Barmaid
Racist Redneck
Sal
Satanic Racist
Springfield Pervert
Telemarketer Lady
Tiesha
Timid Redneck
Tom the Pissed Off Roofer (sometimes called Tom)
Village Idiot
White Thug Girl
Young Redneck
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Soundboard Prank Call redirect. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Last time I visited this article it was completely different and actually alot more professional sounding than this. It's completely amateurish and doesn't even lend any justice anymore to victims or techniques or anything. Is it possible to revisit the article history and revert it back?
KirkCliff2 ( talk) 01:11, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
KirkCliff2 ( talk) 21:02, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
KirkCliff2 ( talk) 21:40, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
No, my version isn't that much better. But at least it removes most of the unsourced information. Personally, I'm all for simply removing the article altogether and not mentioning soundboard prank calls. You seem to equate my stub – which has literally no information – to your version, which has lots and lots of information that needs to be sourced. That's not a fair assessment and it does not justify your re-inclusion of the material.
You have not resolved any of my concerns, most notably with the good, reliable third party sourcing. The only source you offer is literally a Yahoo Answers-like service in which anonymous non-expert people give their two cents. This does not pass WP:SPS or WP:SELFPUB, and definitely does not pass WP:V and WP:RS.
You accuse me of selectively following certain rules but you have not pointed out which ones I have ignored and which I have followed. Nobody has ever discussed the article before, therefore there is not an established "consensus" to go against. If I went to WP:THIRD right now I'm relatively sure that they would agree with me and not with you. Your WP:IAR is an essay, not a rule, and to be quite frank, IAR is not a trump card for ignoring V, RS, NOR, and BURDEN.
You are the one that insists on restoring the article. The solution is simple. Give me good sources, and I will leave it alone. hbdragon88 ( talk) 03:25, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
This article should be merged with the Prank call article, as this article contains less information than necessary to be a complete article and is basically a category of prank call. -- SuperSmashBros.Brawl777 ( talk) 14:52, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
I agree -- 67.224.22.240 ( talk) 10:35, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
How about mention in the article of the victim soundboards which have become popular in the last year. Popular victims are:
Angry Arab
Angry Black Guy (sometimes Called Other Angry Black Guy)
Angry Elevator Guy (soemtimes called Stuck in the Elevator Guy)
Arnolds Escort
Bait Shop Guy
British Bitch
British Idiot
British Jackarse
Black Guy (sometimes called Angry Black Guy)
Casino Man
Chinaman
Chis the Hacker
Confused Mexican
Crackhead
Crazy Indian Guy
Depressed Guy
Drug and Alcohol Lady
Drunk Guy
Duncan
Epic Crazy Lady
Epic Crazy Lady's Husband
G-Girl
High Redneck
Hotel Jackass
Hotel Spaz
Jackass Plumber
Jeff the Pawn Shop Owner
Massage Lady
Peggy (sometimes called Lady Death)
Philly Thug
Pig Sex Lady
Pissed Off Waitress
Racist Barmaid
Racist Redneck
Sal
Satanic Racist
Springfield Pervert
Telemarketer Lady
Tiesha
Timid Redneck
Tom the Pissed Off Roofer (sometimes called Tom)
Village Idiot
White Thug Girl
Young Redneck