Sound and Vision is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Featured article |
This article is rated FA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Image:Bowie SoundAndVision.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot 18:16, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
What genre/subgenre would this be classified as. I'm thinking art pop, with some elements of new wave. Let me know if you have a subgenre that fits better, and thanks in advance. Notarussianspy69 ( talk) 03:38, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
I totally agree that art pop works better, i just couldn't find a good source, so I settled on art rock. Thanks Notarussianspy69 ( talk) 21:19, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Tkbrett ( talk · contribs) 01:32, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
Good Article review progress box
|
Staking my claim on reviewing this article. Tkbrett (✉) 01:32, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
Loved reading this page. One thing that puzzles me. In the section on “Composition” it mentions that Bowie's vocals do not start till 1 minute and 45 seconds into the track. (This is attributed to Buckley, who I think was Bowie's biographer).
On the track I have, the vocal comes in at 1.28. A minor detail, but it is a quite significant feature of this song. I know there have been many different versions of this track, but checking all the versions I can find on iTunes, they are all around the same total length, at 3.04. So how would there be a 17 second difference in the start of the vocal? The intro would have to somehow be 17 seconds longer, which seems unlikely, given it's already considerable length.
I believe I added this track to my collection by recording it off the original vinyl album. So I feel like that should be the original recording.
Could we consider amending the text to quote 1.28 instead of 1.45, unless someone has information that confirms Buckley's version? kritikos99 ( talk) 15:14, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
Sound and Vision is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Featured article |
This article is rated FA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Image:Bowie SoundAndVision.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot 18:16, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
What genre/subgenre would this be classified as. I'm thinking art pop, with some elements of new wave. Let me know if you have a subgenre that fits better, and thanks in advance. Notarussianspy69 ( talk) 03:38, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
I totally agree that art pop works better, i just couldn't find a good source, so I settled on art rock. Thanks Notarussianspy69 ( talk) 21:19, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Tkbrett ( talk · contribs) 01:32, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
Good Article review progress box
|
Staking my claim on reviewing this article. Tkbrett (✉) 01:32, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
Loved reading this page. One thing that puzzles me. In the section on “Composition” it mentions that Bowie's vocals do not start till 1 minute and 45 seconds into the track. (This is attributed to Buckley, who I think was Bowie's biographer).
On the track I have, the vocal comes in at 1.28. A minor detail, but it is a quite significant feature of this song. I know there have been many different versions of this track, but checking all the versions I can find on iTunes, they are all around the same total length, at 3.04. So how would there be a 17 second difference in the start of the vocal? The intro would have to somehow be 17 seconds longer, which seems unlikely, given it's already considerable length.
I believe I added this track to my collection by recording it off the original vinyl album. So I feel like that should be the original recording.
Could we consider amending the text to quote 1.28 instead of 1.45, unless someone has information that confirms Buckley's version? kritikos99 ( talk) 15:14, 31 March 2024 (UTC)