This article was nominated for deletion on 29 September 2008 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hello I add that whoever edited the article and added a link to Sonja cover page of Screen Goddess has not got their facts accurate. That is NOT Sonja Bernhardt.
It is another Sonja (Sonja Breeze) in the IT Industry - Sonja Bernhardt was the innovator of the Screen Goddess Calendar but was not a role model in it. That is inaccurate and needs to be corrected.
I also ask WHY when within Australia Pia Waugh (a wikipedia page entry) is an acceptable entry and Sonja who is within that country as notable as Pia and content is written in a like style considered for deletion.
The content is NOT a CV (and barely gives any work information) it is ALL about industry VOLUNTARY activity that is and has been making a difference to the industry.
I also flag within Australia AWISE and WiT are equivilant to ABI and WITI in America and Sonja equates to Anita Borg and Carolyn Leighton 'fame' in her home country. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.105.232.163 ( talk • contribs) But we can assume it is Sonjabern.
There is an RfC on the question of using "Religion: None" vs. "Religion: None (atheist)" in the infobox on this and other similar pages.
The RfC is at Template talk:Infobox person#RfC: Religion infobox entries for individuals that have no religion.
Please help us determine consensus on this issue. -- Guy Macon ( talk) 00:50, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
This article was nominated for deletion on 29 September 2008 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hello I add that whoever edited the article and added a link to Sonja cover page of Screen Goddess has not got their facts accurate. That is NOT Sonja Bernhardt.
It is another Sonja (Sonja Breeze) in the IT Industry - Sonja Bernhardt was the innovator of the Screen Goddess Calendar but was not a role model in it. That is inaccurate and needs to be corrected.
I also ask WHY when within Australia Pia Waugh (a wikipedia page entry) is an acceptable entry and Sonja who is within that country as notable as Pia and content is written in a like style considered for deletion.
The content is NOT a CV (and barely gives any work information) it is ALL about industry VOLUNTARY activity that is and has been making a difference to the industry.
I also flag within Australia AWISE and WiT are equivilant to ABI and WITI in America and Sonja equates to Anita Borg and Carolyn Leighton 'fame' in her home country. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.105.232.163 ( talk • contribs) But we can assume it is Sonjabern.
There is an RfC on the question of using "Religion: None" vs. "Religion: None (atheist)" in the infobox on this and other similar pages.
The RfC is at Template talk:Infobox person#RfC: Religion infobox entries for individuals that have no religion.
Please help us determine consensus on this issue. -- Guy Macon ( talk) 00:50, 26 April 2015 (UTC)