"the two games have" repetitive here, maybe "they have" will suffice.
"developed by Ancient" link?
Both fair use images need to point directly at this article, not a redirect.
File:GGSonic2SH.png has "yes" next to replaceable, that's not really suitable for fair use because if it is replaceable with something free, it should be. And how do we know it's the Game Gear version? It simply says "emulator" in the file details.
Why in table is it called "Sega Game Gear" when it's just commonly called "Game Gear"?
Are you asking why Game Gear is abbreviated to "SGG" in the review table? That's handled by the template when using the multi-platform feature and I can't change it. Maybe GG would be better, I don't know. Notice how Master System is not abbreviated, so there's not much uniformity in how those headers are decided. The headers are listed at
Module:Video game reviews/data.
TarkusABtalk/
contrib18:12, 27 September 2021 (UTC)reply
Ref 13 needs en-dash and publication and/or accessdate.
"the two games have" repetitive here, maybe "they have" will suffice.
"developed by Ancient" link?
Both fair use images need to point directly at this article, not a redirect.
File:GGSonic2SH.png has "yes" next to replaceable, that's not really suitable for fair use because if it is replaceable with something free, it should be. And how do we know it's the Game Gear version? It simply says "emulator" in the file details.
Why in table is it called "Sega Game Gear" when it's just commonly called "Game Gear"?
Are you asking why Game Gear is abbreviated to "SGG" in the review table? That's handled by the template when using the multi-platform feature and I can't change it. Maybe GG would be better, I don't know. Notice how Master System is not abbreviated, so there's not much uniformity in how those headers are decided. The headers are listed at
Module:Video game reviews/data.
TarkusABtalk/
contrib18:12, 27 September 2021 (UTC)reply
Ref 13 needs en-dash and publication and/or accessdate.