Are you sure Ken Duro Ifill should be linked to a second time under producers in the infobox when he's listed by his initials there?
Remove the exact release date from prose and add the release year in brackets, as the album release date is not notable for the lead
"fourteenth track off his" → "14th track on his" per
MOS:NUM for consistency since you wrote 14th in the body
Everything in the lead needs to be written out in the body, therefore mention the songwriters and producer in prose there
Mention how certain writers received songwriting credit as a result of their work being sampled
Why is Kdi not mentioned under the songwriters when he was one and once you've done this, remove the link for the producer sentence
It is relatively notable for the lead when the song was first played, so mention it as being done so to
Steven Victor at the end of the first para
The R&B and bounce genre blend should be in the same sentence as the sample instead, coming directly before it with a clause
"The track prominently samples and" → ""Something Special" prominently
samples and" with the pipe
Remove "2003 hit song" because this is too much info for the lead
"sees Pop Smoke obsess" → "Lyrically, the song sees Pop Smoke obsess" as a new sentence
"criticized the song as" → "criticized it as" but both of these statements are made by one critic each, so replace with different info and probably try not to use direct quotes
Wikilink should solely be on Hot R&B/Hip-Hop Songs, plus add a space between that and the word chart
"while it further peaked the top 40" → "while it peaked within the top 40", as the US position was not top 40
Mention the platinum certification since that is notable for the lead
Background
Merge with the below section and retitle to Background and composition, as one para sections are not advisable especially for GAs
"in April 2019. Victor wanted to sign Pop Smoke" → "in April 2019, who wanted to sign the rapper" to avoid sentences being too short
"Pop Smoke played him an" → "The rapper played him an" so you don't start two consecutive sentences with his stage name
"high volume. Pop Smoke spent five hours one day in Los Angeles working on the song." → "high volume, which he had spent five hours of one day in Los Angeles working on."
[3][5] should solely be at the end of the sentence and in numerical order
"the line "I really like What you've, done to me" to "You are (You are) something special (My girl) I'll take you on a shopping spree"." → "the lyrics "I really like / What you've, done to me" to "You are (You are) something special / (My girl) I'll take you on a shopping spree"."
"wrote that Pop Smoke's" → "wrote that the song shows where Pop Smoke's" or something similar, to be specific
Critical reception
"Earmilk's Ashton Howard opined the song" → "Howard opined the song"
"Alphonse Pierre said some of" → "Pierre said that some of"
ShootForTheStars Now that you have nominated the article for AFD, I am going to ✗ Fail it since not only does this violate the stability criterion, but you obviously don't believe GA status is worthy now. --
K. Peake20:40, 16 April 2021 (UTC)reply
Are you sure Ken Duro Ifill should be linked to a second time under producers in the infobox when he's listed by his initials there?
Remove the exact release date from prose and add the release year in brackets, as the album release date is not notable for the lead
"fourteenth track off his" → "14th track on his" per
MOS:NUM for consistency since you wrote 14th in the body
Everything in the lead needs to be written out in the body, therefore mention the songwriters and producer in prose there
Mention how certain writers received songwriting credit as a result of their work being sampled
Why is Kdi not mentioned under the songwriters when he was one and once you've done this, remove the link for the producer sentence
It is relatively notable for the lead when the song was first played, so mention it as being done so to
Steven Victor at the end of the first para
The R&B and bounce genre blend should be in the same sentence as the sample instead, coming directly before it with a clause
"The track prominently samples and" → ""Something Special" prominently
samples and" with the pipe
Remove "2003 hit song" because this is too much info for the lead
"sees Pop Smoke obsess" → "Lyrically, the song sees Pop Smoke obsess" as a new sentence
"criticized the song as" → "criticized it as" but both of these statements are made by one critic each, so replace with different info and probably try not to use direct quotes
Wikilink should solely be on Hot R&B/Hip-Hop Songs, plus add a space between that and the word chart
"while it further peaked the top 40" → "while it peaked within the top 40", as the US position was not top 40
Mention the platinum certification since that is notable for the lead
Background
Merge with the below section and retitle to Background and composition, as one para sections are not advisable especially for GAs
"in April 2019. Victor wanted to sign Pop Smoke" → "in April 2019, who wanted to sign the rapper" to avoid sentences being too short
"Pop Smoke played him an" → "The rapper played him an" so you don't start two consecutive sentences with his stage name
"high volume. Pop Smoke spent five hours one day in Los Angeles working on the song." → "high volume, which he had spent five hours of one day in Los Angeles working on."
[3][5] should solely be at the end of the sentence and in numerical order
"the line "I really like What you've, done to me" to "You are (You are) something special (My girl) I'll take you on a shopping spree"." → "the lyrics "I really like / What you've, done to me" to "You are (You are) something special / (My girl) I'll take you on a shopping spree"."
"wrote that Pop Smoke's" → "wrote that the song shows where Pop Smoke's" or something similar, to be specific
Critical reception
"Earmilk's Ashton Howard opined the song" → "Howard opined the song"
"Alphonse Pierre said some of" → "Pierre said that some of"
ShootForTheStars Now that you have nominated the article for AFD, I am going to ✗ Fail it since not only does this violate the stability criterion, but you obviously don't believe GA status is worthy now. --
K. Peake20:40, 16 April 2021 (UTC)reply