 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Not moved. Jafeluv ( talk) 09:15, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
Social spider → Social spiders — Discussing multiple spider species Strageser ( talk) 07:02, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Singular titles are preferred. Johnbod ( talk) 18:25, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose: I do not think this fits into the Exceptions criteria at WP:Naming conventions (plurals). [| Retro00064| ☎talk| ✍contribs|] 02:00, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Shouldn't his page be of mid-importance? Just saying. 88.148.223.130 ( talk) 05:42, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
- Yes, & it's clearly not a stub. Johnbod ( talk) 13:49, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
Well, it may be a lost cause, but I still like to see simple language. It helps the less-expert reader, and makes for easier translation into other languages. For example: "These 23 species are phylogenetically scattered in 11 genera in eight widely separated families". Instead "These 23 species are in 11 genera from eight widely separated families". Macdonald-ross ( talk) 11:31, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
It would be useful to give readers an idea of how large spider colonies tend to be.
I hope someone knowledgeable about this topic can add this information to the article. 2601:200:C000:1A0:F128:3DA5:B358:8B47 ( talk) 18:35, 25 August 2022 (UTC)
|
| This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Not moved. Jafeluv ( talk) 09:15, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
Social spider → Social spiders — Discussing multiple spider species Strageser ( talk) 07:02, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Singular titles are preferred. Johnbod ( talk) 18:25, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose: I do not think this fits into the Exceptions criteria at WP:Naming conventions (plurals). [| Retro00064| ☎talk| ✍contribs|] 02:00, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Shouldn't his page be of mid-importance? Just saying. 88.148.223.130 ( talk) 05:42, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
- Yes, & it's clearly not a stub. Johnbod ( talk) 13:49, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
Well, it may be a lost cause, but I still like to see simple language. It helps the less-expert reader, and makes for easier translation into other languages. For example: "These 23 species are phylogenetically scattered in 11 genera in eight widely separated families". Instead "These 23 species are in 11 genera from eight widely separated families". Macdonald-ross ( talk) 11:31, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
It would be useful to give readers an idea of how large spider colonies tend to be.
I hope someone knowledgeable about this topic can add this information to the article. 2601:200:C000:1A0:F128:3DA5:B358:8B47 ( talk) 18:35, 25 August 2022 (UTC)