This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Social Democratic Party There are too many photos of Geoana! But none of Iliescu, the founder and one of the most known members.
Yes, correct, fixed...I hope it's ok like this
"In the legislative elections of 2004, the PSD gained the largest share of the vote but because it did not have a majority, all the other major parties formed the Justice and Truth alliance, which managed to gain a parliamentary majority and is currently in government, consigning the PSD to opposition."
There is a mistake here, in that the Justice and Truth alliance was already formed by PD and PNL prior to the elections, not after them, so after PSD won the elections but didn't have enough to form a majority, PD and PNL convinced two small parties, PUR (PC today), PSD's ally, and UDMR to join them in forming a coalition (NOT as part of the alliance), in order to form a majority. L337 Krew ( talk) 21:01, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
Image:Psd.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot ( talk) 14:14, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
The idea that FSN/PSDR/PSD is a leftist party is greatly exaggerated. According to Florin Poenaru, "the movement led by Ion Iliescu was from the very beginning the party of local capitalists and not of the industrial proletariat" (p. 36). Cistelecan, Alex (29 May 2017). "Materialismul evanescent". revistavatra.org (in Romanian). Retrieved 4 December 2018. Andrei Pleșu once stated that main post-'89 Romanian political parties do not act on the basis of ideology/doctrine. "22 PLUS, nr. 301: „Orice doctrină devine periculoasă când se transformă în ideologie"". Revista 22 (in Romanian). 31 August 2010. Retrieved 17 October 2019. Tgeorgescu ( talk) 01:05, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
According to Le Monde, PSD is National conservative. I think that this could be added. Source: https://www.lemonde.fr/international/article/2018/12/31/la-roumanie-sur-la-voie-de-la-hongrie-et-de-la-pologne_5403800_3210.html RAMSES$44932 ( talk) 08:46, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
Christian left can also be mentioned as ideology, and it is already in the Romanian-language wikipedia. Source: https://www.romania-insider.com/senate-referendum-traditional-family RAMSES$44932 ( talk) 08:48, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
De jure, PSD is center left. De facto, it is syncretic. I think both should be mentioned RAMSES$44932 ( talk) 08:49, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
Here are some sources: https://www.caleaeuropeana.ro/presedintele-psd-liviu-dragnea-psd-este-cel-mai-mare-partid-de-stanga-din-europa-se-doreste-o-contraofensiva-la-ungaria-cu-o-tara-unde-guvernul-e-de-stanga/
https://www.thenewfederalist.eu/top-30-partide-politice-din-romania RAMSES$44932 ( talk) 17:53, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Is it Right to view PSD as a continuation of FSN since FDSN was more a brokeaway faction and the two candidated agaist eqchother in the 1992 Elections?
Or is better to have Gherman as the first official Party Leader in 1992 or Illiescu as the First unofficial Party Leader?
As this article on the Party's History might Suggest: http://www.politicaromaneasca.ro/partidul_social_democrat-285 DiGrande ( talk) 17:07, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
This is a personal opinion of some critics, not a stated ideology, not acceptable to put such a description in the presentation paragraph, this description is based only on sources that are opposition medias stating their opinion on the current government. To remove from the presentation paragraph, and eventually to add in a "Criticism" section. Also, it is a centre-left party, the fact that it has some socially conservative positions is insufficient to call it "syncretic". Snarcky1996 ( talk) 19:29, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Social Democratic Party There are too many photos of Geoana! But none of Iliescu, the founder and one of the most known members.
Yes, correct, fixed...I hope it's ok like this
"In the legislative elections of 2004, the PSD gained the largest share of the vote but because it did not have a majority, all the other major parties formed the Justice and Truth alliance, which managed to gain a parliamentary majority and is currently in government, consigning the PSD to opposition."
There is a mistake here, in that the Justice and Truth alliance was already formed by PD and PNL prior to the elections, not after them, so after PSD won the elections but didn't have enough to form a majority, PD and PNL convinced two small parties, PUR (PC today), PSD's ally, and UDMR to join them in forming a coalition (NOT as part of the alliance), in order to form a majority. L337 Krew ( talk) 21:01, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
Image:Psd.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot ( talk) 14:14, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
The idea that FSN/PSDR/PSD is a leftist party is greatly exaggerated. According to Florin Poenaru, "the movement led by Ion Iliescu was from the very beginning the party of local capitalists and not of the industrial proletariat" (p. 36). Cistelecan, Alex (29 May 2017). "Materialismul evanescent". revistavatra.org (in Romanian). Retrieved 4 December 2018. Andrei Pleșu once stated that main post-'89 Romanian political parties do not act on the basis of ideology/doctrine. "22 PLUS, nr. 301: „Orice doctrină devine periculoasă când se transformă în ideologie"". Revista 22 (in Romanian). 31 August 2010. Retrieved 17 October 2019. Tgeorgescu ( talk) 01:05, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
According to Le Monde, PSD is National conservative. I think that this could be added. Source: https://www.lemonde.fr/international/article/2018/12/31/la-roumanie-sur-la-voie-de-la-hongrie-et-de-la-pologne_5403800_3210.html RAMSES$44932 ( talk) 08:46, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
Christian left can also be mentioned as ideology, and it is already in the Romanian-language wikipedia. Source: https://www.romania-insider.com/senate-referendum-traditional-family RAMSES$44932 ( talk) 08:48, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
De jure, PSD is center left. De facto, it is syncretic. I think both should be mentioned RAMSES$44932 ( talk) 08:49, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
Here are some sources: https://www.caleaeuropeana.ro/presedintele-psd-liviu-dragnea-psd-este-cel-mai-mare-partid-de-stanga-din-europa-se-doreste-o-contraofensiva-la-ungaria-cu-o-tara-unde-guvernul-e-de-stanga/
https://www.thenewfederalist.eu/top-30-partide-politice-din-romania RAMSES$44932 ( talk) 17:53, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Is it Right to view PSD as a continuation of FSN since FDSN was more a brokeaway faction and the two candidated agaist eqchother in the 1992 Elections?
Or is better to have Gherman as the first official Party Leader in 1992 or Illiescu as the First unofficial Party Leader?
As this article on the Party's History might Suggest: http://www.politicaromaneasca.ro/partidul_social_democrat-285 DiGrande ( talk) 17:07, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
This is a personal opinion of some critics, not a stated ideology, not acceptable to put such a description in the presentation paragraph, this description is based only on sources that are opposition medias stating their opinion on the current government. To remove from the presentation paragraph, and eventually to add in a "Criticism" section. Also, it is a centre-left party, the fact that it has some socially conservative positions is insufficient to call it "syncretic". Snarcky1996 ( talk) 19:29, 16 May 2023 (UTC)