From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Notability

I believe that the topic of this article is notable, but admittedly when I created it I have only used one source. I will add more sources/content soon. The report " Tuatua Tika" details smoking in the Pacific and contains several sections on Tokelau. Furthermore, the New Zealand Medical Journal has published a paper entitled "Should New Zealand do more to help other Pacific nations become smokefree by 2025? The case of Tokelau as a potential example." You need to pay to see the article, but I've emailed one of the authors to ask for a copy explaining that I'm researching for Wikipedia. You can view a summary of the article here. Orthogonal1 ( talk) 20:45, 4 November 2014 (UTC) reply

I've removed the template for notability, as there are now three sources in the article, and there have been no comments. For similar reasons, I've removed Template: Ref improve. I've removed the template about primary sources, as there is now one source which is secondary. If I shouldn't have done this, then just put it back. Orthogonal1 ( talk) 21:32, 8 November 2014 (UTC) reply
That's fine. - Ad Orientem ( talk) 23:34, 8 November 2014 (UTC) reply
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Notability

I believe that the topic of this article is notable, but admittedly when I created it I have only used one source. I will add more sources/content soon. The report " Tuatua Tika" details smoking in the Pacific and contains several sections on Tokelau. Furthermore, the New Zealand Medical Journal has published a paper entitled "Should New Zealand do more to help other Pacific nations become smokefree by 2025? The case of Tokelau as a potential example." You need to pay to see the article, but I've emailed one of the authors to ask for a copy explaining that I'm researching for Wikipedia. You can view a summary of the article here. Orthogonal1 ( talk) 20:45, 4 November 2014 (UTC) reply

I've removed the template for notability, as there are now three sources in the article, and there have been no comments. For similar reasons, I've removed Template: Ref improve. I've removed the template about primary sources, as there is now one source which is secondary. If I shouldn't have done this, then just put it back. Orthogonal1 ( talk) 21:32, 8 November 2014 (UTC) reply
That's fine. - Ad Orientem ( talk) 23:34, 8 November 2014 (UTC) reply

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook