This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Donald Trump High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Donald Trump, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Donald Trump on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Donald TrumpWikipedia:WikiProject Donald TrumpTemplate:WikiProject Donald TrumpDonald Trump articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Law Enforcement High‑importance This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Law Enforcement. Please Join, Create, and Assess.Law EnforcementWikipedia:WikiProject Law EnforcementTemplate:WikiProject Law EnforcementLaw enforcement articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale. Politics: American High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by American politics task force (assessed as High-importance). United States: Government High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government (assessed as High-importance).

A news item involving Smith special counsel investigation was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 10 June 2023.

Daily pageviews of this article A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

Can anyone create a redirect from Jack Smith special counsel investigation to this current article? I couldn't see how to make the uncontroversial request etc. Cheers! 98.155.8.5 ( talk) 01:45, 10 February 2023 (UTC) reply

 Done soibangla ( talk) 02:02, 10 February 2023 (UTC) reply

Thanks!! 98.155.8.5 ( talk) 04:09, 10 February 2023 (UTC) reply

it's here soibangla ( talk) 23:48, 8 June 2023 (UTC) reply

I redirected it here rather than WP:CSD#A3. We don't necessarily need a new article, we can wait and see how it goes. –  Muboshgu ( talk) 23:55, 8 June 2023 (UTC) reply

I went ahead and added language in the lede and to the June section about the indictment. I am super inexperienced with ledes, so feel free to rewrite it or expand on it as much as necessary. I would also suggest protecting it, given this page will probably get a lot of visits soon. -- Delukiel ( talk) 23:59, 8 June 2023 (UTC) reply

Lead edit seems fine to me. Pages are not protected preemptively. –  Muboshgu ( talk) 00:02, 9 June 2023 (UTC) reply

Ok, sounds good! Edit: I actually went ahead and deleted my edit to leave in Soibangla's, since theirs is more detailed. Delukiel ( talk) 00:04, 9 June 2023 (UTC) reply

there are increasing indications that Smith is also investigating Trump fake electors plot, contrary to what our lead says. not quite sure what to do about that yet. ideas? soibangla ( talk) 00:10, 24 June 2023 (UTC) reply

I've considered the fake electors plot to be a portion of the January 6 situation/investigation, as the ploy in Congress was to use the fake elector slates to create enough doubt to delay certification. I don't know that we need to make any changes. –  Muboshgu ( talk) 00:25, 24 June 2023 (UTC) reply

since the indictment, it appears Smith has now pivoted to J6, which might require us to move some furniture around in here. ideas? soibangla ( talk) 17:40, 26 June 2023 (UTC) reply

This article really need to be tidied up into an encyclopedic article. Right now it reads more like a timeline of events, and it has no clear summary of the investigation or key points. Most of the headings are dates! Guinness2702 ( talk) 15:54, 18 January 2024 (UTC) reply