![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
Kandidovala ako súčasť slovenskej ľudovej strany.
Diskusia bola na
fóre národného pozorovateľa.
The issue here is not one of the Spectator being a reliable source or not, it's about WP:WORDS which says that words like extremist are "inherently non-neutral, so they should not be used as unqualified labels in the voice of the article. If a reliable source describes a person or group using one of these words, then the word can be used but the description must be attributed in the article text to its source, preferably by direct quotation, and always with a verifiable citation. If the term is used with a clear meaning by multiple reliable independent sources, then citations to several such sources should be provided for the sentence where it appears." In other words we cannot say "x is an extremist" but "x is considered to be extremist by source A." The Slovak spectator also doesn't say anything about the local population being extremist so that'll have to go as unsourced POV. Valenciano ( talk) 14:11, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
Kandidovala ako súčasť slovenskej ľudovej strany.
Diskusia bola na
fóre národného pozorovateľa.
The issue here is not one of the Spectator being a reliable source or not, it's about WP:WORDS which says that words like extremist are "inherently non-neutral, so they should not be used as unqualified labels in the voice of the article. If a reliable source describes a person or group using one of these words, then the word can be used but the description must be attributed in the article text to its source, preferably by direct quotation, and always with a verifiable citation. If the term is used with a clear meaning by multiple reliable independent sources, then citations to several such sources should be provided for the sentence where it appears." In other words we cannot say "x is an extremist" but "x is considered to be extremist by source A." The Slovak spectator also doesn't say anything about the local population being extremist so that'll have to go as unsourced POV. Valenciano ( talk) 14:11, 25 January 2010 (UTC)