![]() | Slipping rib syndrome has been listed as one of the
Natural sciences good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: September 15, 2021. ( Reviewed version). |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
Hi there! @ 86.169.96.61 I saw you recently edited the SRS page and I wanted to talk to you about the change you made in terms of the congenital deformity in the causes section. The paper cited did not have any mention of a cervical rib, it only mentioned that it was a congenital deformity that allows the rib to slip whenever coming in contact with another rib. -- Eswong3 ( talk) 21:26, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Dracophyllum ( talk · contribs) 03:50, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
I'm happy to do this review, comments to follow Draco phyllum 03:50, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not) |
---|
|
Overall: |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
1) Images are freely licensed and have good succinct captions
2) No edit warring as far as I can tell
3) Earwig turns up nothing
4) Sources are all reliable
5) sections typical of a med article, and it goes into sufficient depth, though see comments below
Some prose comments @ TheRibinator:
So things to work on = making it easier for people with no subject area understanding to get, and a little more info on things like history etc. Draco phyllum 11:14, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
Hi there @ Cowarddd:. I saw your recent edit adding the Hansen method and wanted to leave a courtesy note discussing it instead of just removing it. I myself and @ Jebbles: have both had the Hansen method done and we have considered heavily adding it to the article. However, in accordance with WP:MEDMOS and WP:MEDRS, the paper published by Hansen is a primary source. For us to add it to the article and be reliable, there must be secondary sources on the method.
![]() | Slipping rib syndrome has been listed as one of the
Natural sciences good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: September 15, 2021. ( Reviewed version). |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
Hi there! @ 86.169.96.61 I saw you recently edited the SRS page and I wanted to talk to you about the change you made in terms of the congenital deformity in the causes section. The paper cited did not have any mention of a cervical rib, it only mentioned that it was a congenital deformity that allows the rib to slip whenever coming in contact with another rib. -- Eswong3 ( talk) 21:26, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Dracophyllum ( talk · contribs) 03:50, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
I'm happy to do this review, comments to follow Draco phyllum 03:50, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not) |
---|
|
Overall: |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
1) Images are freely licensed and have good succinct captions
2) No edit warring as far as I can tell
3) Earwig turns up nothing
4) Sources are all reliable
5) sections typical of a med article, and it goes into sufficient depth, though see comments below
Some prose comments @ TheRibinator:
So things to work on = making it easier for people with no subject area understanding to get, and a little more info on things like history etc. Draco phyllum 11:14, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
Hi there @ Cowarddd:. I saw your recent edit adding the Hansen method and wanted to leave a courtesy note discussing it instead of just removing it. I myself and @ Jebbles: have both had the Hansen method done and we have considered heavily adding it to the article. However, in accordance with WP:MEDMOS and WP:MEDRS, the paper published by Hansen is a primary source. For us to add it to the article and be reliable, there must be secondary sources on the method.