This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Books This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles This article has been marked as needing an infobox. Literature This article is within the scope of WikiProject Literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LiteratureWikipedia:WikiProject LiteratureTemplate:WikiProject LiteratureLiterature articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Unsure whether an auto- bio text as such should be considered part of the bio project? Satu Suro 07:20, 14 August 2007 (UTC) reply

Removed Australia project- as technically the autobiography deals with his life prior to moving to australia Satu Suro 07:24, 14 August 2007 (UTC) reply

Comment concerning citations is irrelevant - the book is probably not cited much elsewhere but the article is an extremely good and concise synopsis of the book. As can be confirmed by actually reading it... Peter R Hastings ( talk) 17:21, 5 December 2008 (UTC) reply

If Shute's account is declared to be biased, it would be more convincing if one or two examples of the distortions were summarised. The crash of the R101 was a pretty unequivocal proof of mismanagement. 86.183.122.42 ( talk) 17:46, 29 November 2012 (UTC) reply

I agree that (to me) this section indicates an unsubstantiated bias. RobinClay ( talk) 23:56, 5 January 2017 (UTC) reply