This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Is there a source on the Marvel press release calling Sleepwalker "Sandman done right?" My recollection (and I have no source either) is that the press release called Sleepwalker "Sandman done the Marvel way," which is somewhat less insulting to Sandman and Neil Gaiman.
I remember reading a story in a horror reprint book from the 1970s that ended with the revelation that the character the reader was led to assume is human looks identical to the sleepwalkers. That ought to receive a mention here, but I do not know the details. -- Scottandrewhutchins 18:56, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
Is there anything explicitly linking the Wozuans with Sleepwalker and his race? 204.153.84.10 ( talk) 17:21, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
Image:E SLEE001CVR proof5.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot ( talk) 06:42, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Sleepwalker (comics). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 10:08, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Is there a source on the Marvel press release calling Sleepwalker "Sandman done right?" My recollection (and I have no source either) is that the press release called Sleepwalker "Sandman done the Marvel way," which is somewhat less insulting to Sandman and Neil Gaiman.
I remember reading a story in a horror reprint book from the 1970s that ended with the revelation that the character the reader was led to assume is human looks identical to the sleepwalkers. That ought to receive a mention here, but I do not know the details. -- Scottandrewhutchins 18:56, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
Is there anything explicitly linking the Wozuans with Sleepwalker and his race? 204.153.84.10 ( talk) 17:21, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
Image:E SLEE001CVR proof5.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot ( talk) 06:42, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Sleepwalker (comics). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 10:08, 15 December 2017 (UTC)