This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
quotation: ...exclusively as a written language (no one ever actually spoke it)
It is not true, it was spoken by the clergy and some intellectuals. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.117.36.167 ( talk) 02:36, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
Is Slavonic-Serbian really the most common name? -- Ivan Štambuk ( talk) 22:14, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
I believe Gbooks hits do favour "Slavo-Serbian" (118), rather than "Slaveno-Serbian" (76) and "Slavonic-Serbian", the latter being harder to estimate due to more false hits — commas showing up as hyphens ("...Old Church Slavonic, Serbian, Russian...", etc.).-- Zoupan 21:40, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
quotation: ...exclusively as a written language (no one ever actually spoke it)
It is not true, it was spoken by the clergy and some intellectuals. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.117.36.167 ( talk) 02:36, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
Is Slavonic-Serbian really the most common name? -- Ivan Štambuk ( talk) 22:14, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
I believe Gbooks hits do favour "Slavo-Serbian" (118), rather than "Slaveno-Serbian" (76) and "Slavonic-Serbian", the latter being harder to estimate due to more false hits — commas showing up as hyphens ("...Old Church Slavonic, Serbian, Russian...", etc.).-- Zoupan 21:40, 23 August 2016 (UTC)