| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Crisco 1492 ( talk · contribs) 12:02, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
- I'll do this in several steps. Crisco 1492 ( talk) 12:02, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
Checklist
| Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Well-written: | ||
|
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. | Considering how much expansion this article needs, it would be a waste to go through this for now |
|
|
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. | |
| 2. Verifiable with no original research: | ||
|
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. | Needs access dates, at the very least |
|
|
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). | Referencing is not up to par; several sections have no references |
|
|
2c. it contains no original research. | Unable to be checked until referencing is improved |
| 3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
|
|
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. | I agree with the current start classification, as much more information could be found on the sign. |
|
|
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). | |
|
|
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. | |
|
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. | Fine |
| 6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
|
|
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. | Fine |
|
|
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. | Fine |
|
|
7+. . | Pending |
Needs major work before promotion. Holding for one week.
Crisco 1492 (
talk) 12:17, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
- Failed due to lack of response and huge amounts of work needed. Crisco 1492 ( talk) 23:09, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Crisco 1492 ( talk · contribs) 12:02, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
- I'll do this in several steps. Crisco 1492 ( talk) 12:02, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
Checklist
| Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Well-written: | ||
|
|
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. | Considering how much expansion this article needs, it would be a waste to go through this for now |
|
|
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. | |
| 2. Verifiable with no original research: | ||
|
|
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. | Needs access dates, at the very least |
|
|
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). | Referencing is not up to par; several sections have no references |
|
|
2c. it contains no original research. | Unable to be checked until referencing is improved |
| 3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
|
|
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. | I agree with the current start classification, as much more information could be found on the sign. |
|
|
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). | |
|
|
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. | |
|
|
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. | Fine |
| 6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
|
|
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. | Fine |
|
|
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. | Fine |
|
|
7+. . | Pending |
- Needs major work before promotion. Holding for one week.
Crisco 1492 (
talk) 12:17, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
- Failed due to lack of response and huge amounts of work needed. Crisco 1492 ( talk) 23:09, 18 November 2011 (UTC)