![]() | Skeletons on the Zahara was a Language and literature good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | |||||||||
|
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: María ( habla con migo) 13:06, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
Hello, I will be reviewing this article for GAC. I'm not entirely convinced it's there just yet, but with a little hard work I think it might make it. :) Here is how it stands against the criteria:
There are various issues with the article not being well-written in parts. Some examples:
These points need to be taken care of in order for the article to be broad in its coverage:
As you can see, this needs some more work, but if the main contributors are interested I think it can be greatly improved within the week allowed for this GAC review. I'm putting the article on hold for now. If you have any questions, let me know! María ( habla con migo) 13:06, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
![]() | Skeletons on the Zahara was a Language and literature good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | |||||||||
|
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: María ( habla con migo) 13:06, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
Hello, I will be reviewing this article for GAC. I'm not entirely convinced it's there just yet, but with a little hard work I think it might make it. :) Here is how it stands against the criteria:
There are various issues with the article not being well-written in parts. Some examples:
These points need to be taken care of in order for the article to be broad in its coverage:
As you can see, this needs some more work, but if the main contributors are interested I think it can be greatly improved within the week allowed for this GAC review. I'm putting the article on hold for now. If you have any questions, let me know! María ( habla con migo) 13:06, 12 April 2011 (UTC)