This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Sizewell C nuclear power station article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Please add titles, websites, publishers, date of access and of course URL's to your references, thank you Alex Berrow ( talk) 19:03, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
If possible, please could someone source an artists impression from the EDF website about the project. I have no clue how to do this. Example image: https://www.edfenergy.com/energy/nuclear-new-build-projects/sizewell-c/news-views/planning-inspectorate-accepts-sizewell-c-planning-application-for-examination Alex Berrow ( talk) 19:39, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Berkeley Nuclear Power Station which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. Rosbif73 ( talk) 15:30, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Should this be updated, as on 20th July 2022, the UK Government has approved the plans? https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-suffolk-62235221 Wagnerp16 ( talk) 11:42, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
TASC is given a prominent section, detailing irrational objections to the plant.
Such groups making unscientific claims are often funded by the oil lobby in the American arena. Is there any access to how they are financed? Does being an "unincorporated group" help us see how money flows through it?
I've already removed a claim that Sizewell C will contaminate the area, something nuclear energy plants don't do during operation or after decommisioning.
I would like to remove the remaining bulletpoints presented as factual, when they aren't even supported with a citation, and don't sound true. Talk⁄ Louis Waweru 03:01, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
Searching the host website does not find the paper previously listed 84.64.12.8 ( talk) 10:10, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Sizewell C nuclear power station article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Please add titles, websites, publishers, date of access and of course URL's to your references, thank you Alex Berrow ( talk) 19:03, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
If possible, please could someone source an artists impression from the EDF website about the project. I have no clue how to do this. Example image: https://www.edfenergy.com/energy/nuclear-new-build-projects/sizewell-c/news-views/planning-inspectorate-accepts-sizewell-c-planning-application-for-examination Alex Berrow ( talk) 19:39, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Berkeley Nuclear Power Station which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. Rosbif73 ( talk) 15:30, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Should this be updated, as on 20th July 2022, the UK Government has approved the plans? https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-suffolk-62235221 Wagnerp16 ( talk) 11:42, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
TASC is given a prominent section, detailing irrational objections to the plant.
Such groups making unscientific claims are often funded by the oil lobby in the American arena. Is there any access to how they are financed? Does being an "unincorporated group" help us see how money flows through it?
I've already removed a claim that Sizewell C will contaminate the area, something nuclear energy plants don't do during operation or after decommisioning.
I would like to remove the remaining bulletpoints presented as factual, when they aren't even supported with a citation, and don't sound true. Talk⁄ Louis Waweru 03:01, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
Searching the host website does not find the paper previously listed 84.64.12.8 ( talk) 10:10, 15 April 2023 (UTC)