This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Delete
Not really notable.
If you want it to stay add more information!
WILLROCKS10 ( talk) 19:18, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
Hi,
This article is perfectly acceptable to be on Wikipedia. Look how much information I've found on it after a quick 10 minute search. There's loads of information to be found on it yet. Give it a chance-After all it's a new page. That's what I always it. Some people can't be bothered to find information on pages that could be good. Just give it a chance!
Thanks, pbl1998-- Pbl1998 ( talk) 18:10, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
Hi,
I am going to revert the edits as they are irrelavent. The template you placed on the page is not needed as the page is divided into good sections already. Secondly, the 'or maybe vice-versa' is perfectly fine. As we do not know whether or not the river is named after the village, or the other way around, we need to keep it.
Thanks, -- Pbl1998 ( talk) 12:03, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
"Or maybe vice- versa" is not good english. We do not need to keep this bad english on the page - Willrocks10 Speak to me 12:05, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
On the contrary, I think it is (or maybe it is bad Latin?)!!!!! Isee no reason why you need to interfere with this article.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Delete
Not really notable.
If you want it to stay add more information!
WILLROCKS10 ( talk) 19:18, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
Hi,
This article is perfectly acceptable to be on Wikipedia. Look how much information I've found on it after a quick 10 minute search. There's loads of information to be found on it yet. Give it a chance-After all it's a new page. That's what I always it. Some people can't be bothered to find information on pages that could be good. Just give it a chance!
Thanks, pbl1998-- Pbl1998 ( talk) 18:10, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
Hi,
I am going to revert the edits as they are irrelavent. The template you placed on the page is not needed as the page is divided into good sections already. Secondly, the 'or maybe vice-versa' is perfectly fine. As we do not know whether or not the river is named after the village, or the other way around, we need to keep it.
Thanks, -- Pbl1998 ( talk) 12:03, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
"Or maybe vice- versa" is not good english. We do not need to keep this bad english on the page - Willrocks10 Speak to me 12:05, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
On the contrary, I think it is (or maybe it is bad Latin?)!!!!! Isee no reason why you need to interfere with this article.