| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Adityavagarwal ( talk · contribs) 07:33, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
- "This comes from a legend about their discovery, involving lonely sailors mistaking them for mermaids." needs citation. Adityavagarwal ( talk) 07:33, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
- "Seekoei (sea cow) is also the name for a hippopotamus in Afrikaans." and "In some Germanic languages, see can mean either a body of fresh or salt water, so this follows from the species inhabiting lakes in southern Africa rather than the sea itself." need citation to. Adityavagarwal ( talk) 07:33, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
- Hydromalinae should be linked. Adityavagarwal ( talk) 07:33, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
- oops, fixed User:Dunkleosteus77 | push to talk 15:18, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
- Dugonginae too should be linked. Adityavagarwal ( talk) 07:33, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
- it just links back to dugong so it'd be a duplink User:Dunkleosteus77 | push to talk 15:18, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
- 8 km/h (5.0 mph) or 8 kilometres per hour (5.0 mph), we could have consistency there. Adityavagarwal ( talk) 07:33, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
- 8 to 10 t (8.8 to 11.0 short tons) (in the lead) is metric tons right? The "t" makes it look more like tons. Also, we could have consistency with "8 to 10 metric tons (8.8 to 11.0 short tons)"
- Similarly, 8 m (26 ft) and 9 metres (30 ft) (m or metres) could have consistency too. Adityavagarwal ( talk) 07:33, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
- Link "snout". Adityavagarwal ( talk) 07:33, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
- "virtually endless ..." is it not a bit exaggerated?
Adityavagarwal (
talk)
07:33, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
- changed to "infinite" User:Dunkleosteus77 | push to talk 15:18, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
- "brevotoxin..." is it "brevetoxin" instead? Adityavagarwal ( talk) 07:33, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
- Do we really need this as an External Link? Adityavagarwal ( talk) 07:33, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
- nope, deleted User:Dunkleosteus77 | push to talk 15:18, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
- Current ref 17 needs a page number. Adityavagarwal ( talk) 07:33, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
- if it's "The Earliest Known Fully Quadrupedal Sirenian" I think someone beat me to it, it's fixed
User:Dunkleosteus77 |
push to talk
15:18, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
- Oops, I mean 19. I have fixed it. Adityavagarwal ( talk) 16:15, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
A really solid article!
Very well written!
- Is it well written?
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- B. It complies with the
manual of style guidelines for
lead sections,
layout,
words to watch,
fiction, and
list incorporation:
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- Is it
verifiable with no original research?
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with
the layout style guideline:
- B. All
in-line citations are from
reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or
likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the
scientific citation guidelines:
- C. It contains
no original research:
- D. It contains no
copyright violations nor
plagiarism:
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with
the layout style guideline:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. It addresses the
main aspects of the topic:
- B. It stays
focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see
summary style):
- A. It addresses the
main aspects of the topic:
- Is it
neutral?
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- Is it stable?
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing
edit war or content dispute:
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing
edit war or content dispute:
- Is it illustrated, if possible, by
images?
- A. Images are
tagged with their
copyright status, and
valid fair use rationales are provided for
non-free content:
- B. Images are
relevant to the topic, and have
suitable captions:
- A. Images are
tagged with their
copyright status, and
valid fair use rationales are provided for
non-free content:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
An article of stellar quality. Stellar? We could have a star on it too!
Very well written, and an obvious GA pass!
Adityavagarwal (
talk)
16:19, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Adityavagarwal ( talk · contribs) 07:33, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
- "This comes from a legend about their discovery, involving lonely sailors mistaking them for mermaids." needs citation. Adityavagarwal ( talk) 07:33, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
- "Seekoei (sea cow) is also the name for a hippopotamus in Afrikaans." and "In some Germanic languages, see can mean either a body of fresh or salt water, so this follows from the species inhabiting lakes in southern Africa rather than the sea itself." need citation to. Adityavagarwal ( talk) 07:33, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
- Hydromalinae should be linked. Adityavagarwal ( talk) 07:33, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
- oops, fixed User:Dunkleosteus77 | push to talk 15:18, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
- Dugonginae too should be linked. Adityavagarwal ( talk) 07:33, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
- it just links back to dugong so it'd be a duplink User:Dunkleosteus77 | push to talk 15:18, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
- 8 km/h (5.0 mph) or 8 kilometres per hour (5.0 mph), we could have consistency there. Adityavagarwal ( talk) 07:33, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
- 8 to 10 t (8.8 to 11.0 short tons) (in the lead) is metric tons right? The "t" makes it look more like tons. Also, we could have consistency with "8 to 10 metric tons (8.8 to 11.0 short tons)"
- Similarly, 8 m (26 ft) and 9 metres (30 ft) (m or metres) could have consistency too. Adityavagarwal ( talk) 07:33, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
- Link "snout". Adityavagarwal ( talk) 07:33, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
- "virtually endless ..." is it not a bit exaggerated?
Adityavagarwal (
talk)
07:33, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
- changed to "infinite" User:Dunkleosteus77 | push to talk 15:18, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
- "brevotoxin..." is it "brevetoxin" instead? Adityavagarwal ( talk) 07:33, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
- Do we really need this as an External Link? Adityavagarwal ( talk) 07:33, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
- nope, deleted User:Dunkleosteus77 | push to talk 15:18, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
- Current ref 17 needs a page number. Adityavagarwal ( talk) 07:33, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
- if it's "The Earliest Known Fully Quadrupedal Sirenian" I think someone beat me to it, it's fixed
User:Dunkleosteus77 |
push to talk
15:18, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
- Oops, I mean 19. I have fixed it. Adityavagarwal ( talk) 16:15, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
A really solid article!
Very well written!
- Is it well written?
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- B. It complies with the
manual of style guidelines for
lead sections,
layout,
words to watch,
fiction, and
list incorporation:
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- Is it
verifiable with no original research?
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with
the layout style guideline:
- B. All
in-line citations are from
reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or
likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the
scientific citation guidelines:
- C. It contains
no original research:
- D. It contains no
copyright violations nor
plagiarism:
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with
the layout style guideline:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. It addresses the
main aspects of the topic:
- B. It stays
focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see
summary style):
- A. It addresses the
main aspects of the topic:
- Is it
neutral?
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- Is it stable?
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing
edit war or content dispute:
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing
edit war or content dispute:
- Is it illustrated, if possible, by
images?
- A. Images are
tagged with their
copyright status, and
valid fair use rationales are provided for
non-free content:
- B. Images are
relevant to the topic, and have
suitable captions:
- A. Images are
tagged with their
copyright status, and
valid fair use rationales are provided for
non-free content:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
An article of stellar quality. Stellar? We could have a star on it too!
Very well written, and an obvious GA pass!
Adityavagarwal (
talk)
16:19, 27 August 2017 (UTC)