| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Sjones23 ( talk · contribs) 18:44, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
So far, this article looks good, but there are a slight
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar):
b (
MoS for
lead,
layout,
word choice,
fiction, and
lists):
- Everything looks good, but please file a request with
WP:GOCE for copyediting. It doesn't matter if they don't get to it in time for this GA Review, just another helpful step in the quality improvement process. Also, you may want to post to talk pages of relevant WikiProjects, asking for help from copyeditors.
- Done. Requested copy-editing from WP:GOCE.-- Changedforbetter ( talk) 23:18, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
- Everything looks good, but please file a request with
WP:GOCE for copyediting. It doesn't matter if they don't get to it in time for this GA Review, just another helpful step in the quality improvement process. Also, you may want to post to talk pages of relevant WikiProjects, asking for help from copyeditors.
- a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar):
- It is factually accurate and
verifiable.
- a (
reference section): b (citations to
reliable sources): c (
OR):
- Please go through and make sure citations are all formatted with information filling out fields from citation templates using
WP:CIT, make sure no cites are just a bare link and a title and also go through and make sure cites verify
WP:V. All cites should be reviewed per
WP:RS standards. All dead citations should be replaced.
- Done. Article is completely void of dead links; references follow citations format all available fields.-- Changedforbetter ( talk) 23:23, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
- Please go through and make sure citations are all formatted with information filling out fields from citation templates using
WP:CIT, make sure no cites are just a bare link and a title and also go through and make sure cites verify
WP:V. All cites should be reviewed per
WP:RS standards. All dead citations should be replaced.
- a (
reference section):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (
major aspects): b (
focused):
- a (
major aspects):
- It follows the
neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars within the last couple of weeks, looks pretty stable to me.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by
images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have
fair use rationales): b (
appropriate use with
suitable captions):
- Fair use rationales are
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have
fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- This article looks good so far and I will wait a few weeks or so before I can pass or fail it.
- All items listed above have been taken into consideration and corrected. Thank you.-- Changedforbetter ( talk) 23:23, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
- This article looks good so far and I will wait a few weeks or so before I can pass or fail it.
- Pass/Fail:
Hope these help. Lord Sjones23 ( talk - contributions) 18:44, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
This article satisfies the GA criteria, and I am going to make this a pass. Well done! Lord Sjones23 ( talk - contributions) 23:28, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Sjones23 ( talk · contribs) 18:44, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
So far, this article looks good, but there are a slight
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (
MoS for
lead,
layout,
word choice,
fiction, and
lists):
- Everything looks good, but please file a request with
WP:GOCE for copyediting. It doesn't matter if they don't get to it in time for this GA Review, just another helpful step in the quality improvement process. Also, you may want to post to talk pages of relevant WikiProjects, asking for help from copyeditors.
- Done. Requested copy-editing from WP:GOCE.-- Changedforbetter ( talk) 23:18, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
- Everything looks good, but please file a request with
WP:GOCE for copyediting. It doesn't matter if they don't get to it in time for this GA Review, just another helpful step in the quality improvement process. Also, you may want to post to talk pages of relevant WikiProjects, asking for help from copyeditors.
- a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar):
- It is factually accurate and
verifiable.
- a (
reference section): b (citations to
reliable sources): c (
OR):
- Please go through and make sure citations are all formatted with information filling out fields from citation templates using
WP:CIT, make sure no cites are just a bare link and a title and also go through and make sure cites verify
WP:V. All cites should be reviewed per
WP:RS standards. All dead citations should be replaced.
- Done. Article is completely void of dead links; references follow citations format all available fields.-- Changedforbetter ( talk) 23:23, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
- Please go through and make sure citations are all formatted with information filling out fields from citation templates using
WP:CIT, make sure no cites are just a bare link and a title and also go through and make sure cites verify
WP:V. All cites should be reviewed per
WP:RS standards. All dead citations should be replaced.
- a (
reference section):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (
major aspects): b (
focused):
- a (
major aspects):
- It follows the
neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars within the last couple of weeks, looks pretty stable to me.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by
images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have
fair use rationales): b (
appropriate use with
suitable captions):
- Fair use rationales are
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have
fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- This article looks good so far and I will wait a few weeks or so before I can pass or fail it.
- All items listed above have been taken into consideration and corrected. Thank you.-- Changedforbetter ( talk) 23:23, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
- This article looks good so far and I will wait a few weeks or so before I can pass or fail it.
- Pass/Fail:
Hope these help. Lord Sjones23 ( talk - contributions) 18:44, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
This article satisfies the GA criteria, and I am going to make this a pass. Well done! Lord Sjones23 ( talk - contributions) 23:28, 15 August 2013 (UTC)