![]() | This page was proposed for deletion by TTN ( talk · contribs) on 23 March 2020. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
People seem to misread the description. The great wheel that comprises the outlands is infinite, the spire is not. The spire merely rises up above the clouds to an "unreachable height." It is true that the spire is always able to be seen, but it is not of infinite height. Because of this, I have modified the article to coincide with the material provided. - Emhilradim 20:59, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
In this the excessive editting of the page makes it all but unreadable. As I belive his edits are disruptive to the quality of this article, and not based on a true desire to improve this article, I think I am/have reverting/reverted his edits. For those wondering w hy I am not assuming good faith on his part see: Request for Mediation ANd: Request for Arbitration I am NOT attempting to attack or insult him. And this article could use some improvement. But excessive notices at the top of the article won't help. Instead, I've replaced them with a request for an expert in the field. Kairos ( talk) 07:21, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
I have removed your cleen up tags for the reasons propvided above. Though I could agree to merging lady of pain inot THIS article. Kairos ( talk) 04:41, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
Thank you Shemeska. I apreciate your efforts to actually improve this article. Kairos ( talk) 12:39, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
The image Image:Pgp 007 01.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. -- 07:53, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
I have restored the notability template, as this ficitonal location has no notabilty per se, as it is just one location within a category of locations (the Outer Plane) which is not notable. I would like to see evidence of notability presented here before the template is removed as I could find none.-- Gavin Collins ( talk) 22:25, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
-removed indent-Sigil is a fairly important topic in the Planescape setting, since it is the setting's main location. However, I doubt that it will be possible to find real-world commentary in the same way as Middle-earth has which specifically focuses on Sigil. I can probably find plenty that focus on Planescape with a paragraph or two about Sigil. Would that work? - Drilnoth ( talk) 13:12, 9 December 2008 (UTC) {just to mention it, the Middle-earth article has an awful lot of in-universe and uncited content, too). - Drilnoth ( talk) 13:13, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
The article quotes one of the creators saying Sigil's factions were created in response to Vampire: The Masquerade being a popular game and having clans. But Sigil was first published in 1989 and V:tM wasn't published until 1991. Not only is it unlikely that they heard much about V:tM pre-publishing, but it's impossible for it to have been a popular game, isn't it? This may be how the creator remembers it, but it isn't true and should be removed (or at least mentioned that it's not accurate). I'll remove or change it in a few days unless someone does it first or gives me a compelling reason not to. - 67.187.245.98 ( talk) 15:14, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Sigil (Dungeons & Dragons). Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 00:59, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Sigil (Dungeons & Dragons). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 22:15, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
![]() | This page was proposed for deletion by TTN ( talk · contribs) on 23 March 2020. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
People seem to misread the description. The great wheel that comprises the outlands is infinite, the spire is not. The spire merely rises up above the clouds to an "unreachable height." It is true that the spire is always able to be seen, but it is not of infinite height. Because of this, I have modified the article to coincide with the material provided. - Emhilradim 20:59, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
In this the excessive editting of the page makes it all but unreadable. As I belive his edits are disruptive to the quality of this article, and not based on a true desire to improve this article, I think I am/have reverting/reverted his edits. For those wondering w hy I am not assuming good faith on his part see: Request for Mediation ANd: Request for Arbitration I am NOT attempting to attack or insult him. And this article could use some improvement. But excessive notices at the top of the article won't help. Instead, I've replaced them with a request for an expert in the field. Kairos ( talk) 07:21, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
I have removed your cleen up tags for the reasons propvided above. Though I could agree to merging lady of pain inot THIS article. Kairos ( talk) 04:41, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
Thank you Shemeska. I apreciate your efforts to actually improve this article. Kairos ( talk) 12:39, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
The image Image:Pgp 007 01.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. -- 07:53, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
I have restored the notability template, as this ficitonal location has no notabilty per se, as it is just one location within a category of locations (the Outer Plane) which is not notable. I would like to see evidence of notability presented here before the template is removed as I could find none.-- Gavin Collins ( talk) 22:25, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
-removed indent-Sigil is a fairly important topic in the Planescape setting, since it is the setting's main location. However, I doubt that it will be possible to find real-world commentary in the same way as Middle-earth has which specifically focuses on Sigil. I can probably find plenty that focus on Planescape with a paragraph or two about Sigil. Would that work? - Drilnoth ( talk) 13:12, 9 December 2008 (UTC) {just to mention it, the Middle-earth article has an awful lot of in-universe and uncited content, too). - Drilnoth ( talk) 13:13, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
The article quotes one of the creators saying Sigil's factions were created in response to Vampire: The Masquerade being a popular game and having clans. But Sigil was first published in 1989 and V:tM wasn't published until 1991. Not only is it unlikely that they heard much about V:tM pre-publishing, but it's impossible for it to have been a popular game, isn't it? This may be how the creator remembers it, but it isn't true and should be removed (or at least mentioned that it's not accurate). I'll remove or change it in a few days unless someone does it first or gives me a compelling reason not to. - 67.187.245.98 ( talk) 15:14, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Sigil (Dungeons & Dragons). Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 00:59, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Sigil (Dungeons & Dragons). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 22:15, 30 December 2016 (UTC)