This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Siege of Saïo article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Siege of Saïo has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the " On this day..." column on July 6, 2023. |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Tidied citations and references, did a quick ce, added banner to talk page, checked for duplicate wikilinks. Pls revert any undesired changes. Regards Keith-264 ( talk) 10:43, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
East African Campaign (World War II) pasted in material from here to add to the Background and Prelude for context, revert as desired. Keith-264 ( talk) 09:59, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
@ Indy beetle: Is the article in AmEng? Keith-264 ( talk) 17:29, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
* {{cite book |ref={{harvid|Playfair|2004}} |last1=Playfair |first1=Major-General I. S. O. |first2=Captain F. C. |last2=Flynn RN |first3=Brigadier C. J. C. |last3=Molony |first4=Air Vice-Marshal S. E. |last4=Toomer |editor-last=Butler |editor-first=J. R. M. |series=History of the Second World War, United Kingdom Military Series |title=The Mediterranean and Middle East: The Germans come to the help of their Ally (1941) |volume=II |publisher=Naval & Military Press |year=2004 |orig-year=1st. pub. [[HMSO]] 1956 |isbn=978-1-84574-066-5 |display-authors=1}} ? Keith-264 ( talk) 22:59, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
The sfns for Playfair 1954 are from volume I (it's my book) so volume II is the 2004 reprint of the 1956 original of volume II. Keith-264 ( talk) 23:21, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: HerodotusTheFraud ( talk · contribs) 23:54, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
I will review this one shortly. Regards,
Herodotus (
talk) 23:54, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
An interesting article, and it falls in nicely with some of my recent work. With that said, I do have a number of comments:
On the whole, I believe is a good article, but I think some revisions style-wise could be used throughout. I'll have another look once you've responded to the comments. — Preceding unsigned comment added by HerodotusTheFraud ( talk • contribs) 02:23, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Edits were still going through June, but now things have stopped, presumably the above has been addressed. Can this be double-checked and this continued? Wizardman 14:25, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
Excellent piece of digging Indy. Regards Keith-264 ( talk) 07:34, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
[1] I think that the Abyssinian Campaign book is the same as this but 1942. Keith-264 ( talk) 16:29, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
@ Indy beetle: The article's turned out rather well hasn't it? Regards. Keith-264 ( talk) 07:58, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Siege of Saïo article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Siege of Saïo has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the " On this day..." column on July 6, 2023. |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Tidied citations and references, did a quick ce, added banner to talk page, checked for duplicate wikilinks. Pls revert any undesired changes. Regards Keith-264 ( talk) 10:43, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
East African Campaign (World War II) pasted in material from here to add to the Background and Prelude for context, revert as desired. Keith-264 ( talk) 09:59, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
@ Indy beetle: Is the article in AmEng? Keith-264 ( talk) 17:29, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
* {{cite book |ref={{harvid|Playfair|2004}} |last1=Playfair |first1=Major-General I. S. O. |first2=Captain F. C. |last2=Flynn RN |first3=Brigadier C. J. C. |last3=Molony |first4=Air Vice-Marshal S. E. |last4=Toomer |editor-last=Butler |editor-first=J. R. M. |series=History of the Second World War, United Kingdom Military Series |title=The Mediterranean and Middle East: The Germans come to the help of their Ally (1941) |volume=II |publisher=Naval & Military Press |year=2004 |orig-year=1st. pub. [[HMSO]] 1956 |isbn=978-1-84574-066-5 |display-authors=1}} ? Keith-264 ( talk) 22:59, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
The sfns for Playfair 1954 are from volume I (it's my book) so volume II is the 2004 reprint of the 1956 original of volume II. Keith-264 ( talk) 23:21, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: HerodotusTheFraud ( talk · contribs) 23:54, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
I will review this one shortly. Regards,
Herodotus (
talk) 23:54, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
An interesting article, and it falls in nicely with some of my recent work. With that said, I do have a number of comments:
On the whole, I believe is a good article, but I think some revisions style-wise could be used throughout. I'll have another look once you've responded to the comments. — Preceding unsigned comment added by HerodotusTheFraud ( talk • contribs) 02:23, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Edits were still going through June, but now things have stopped, presumably the above has been addressed. Can this be double-checked and this continued? Wizardman 14:25, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
Excellent piece of digging Indy. Regards Keith-264 ( talk) 07:34, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
[1] I think that the Abyssinian Campaign book is the same as this but 1942. Keith-264 ( talk) 16:29, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
@ Indy beetle: The article's turned out rather well hasn't it? Regards. Keith-264 ( talk) 07:58, 20 April 2020 (UTC)