![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
iblogger.org is on the blacklist [1] so images from it should not be used. See also the whitelist discussion| [2]
Graeme374 ( talk) 04:44, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
The article, especially the introduction, seems more like an opinion rather than objective facts. Morever, there are no supporting citations for that. Hence this content should either be done away with or modified with verifiable facts. 180.151.22.67 ( talk) 17:30, 1 July 2015 (UTC)Aman
It looks as if this article is more like an opinion or a biased story. This article should just state the facts and with Neutral point of view. The stuff is stuffed with adjectives which are biased much of the times. Adjectives should be done away with. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 106.219.49.154 ( talk) 04:59, 17 July 2015 (UTC)
there have been a lot of edits on this article without references. The older version was a lot more neutral. Divyraj ( talk) 15:08, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
Abul Fazl comments on the horrors of the bloody battle for the conquest of Chittor in verse as follows:
"No one ever saw such battles, Nor ever heard of such from the experienced. What shall I say of that battle and engagement, I cannot mention one item out of a hundred thousand. [1]
Divyraj ( talk) 15:13, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
References
I can understand that the casualties on Mughal side is displayed on the infobox based on the statement of Satish Chandra The siege also resulted in heavy casualties on the Mughal side, where two hundred of them were killed every day.
But wouldn't it be considered as
original research as the author doesn't give any direct statement about the casualties?
Imperial
[AFCND]
14:20, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
iblogger.org is on the blacklist [1] so images from it should not be used. See also the whitelist discussion| [2]
Graeme374 ( talk) 04:44, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
The article, especially the introduction, seems more like an opinion rather than objective facts. Morever, there are no supporting citations for that. Hence this content should either be done away with or modified with verifiable facts. 180.151.22.67 ( talk) 17:30, 1 July 2015 (UTC)Aman
It looks as if this article is more like an opinion or a biased story. This article should just state the facts and with Neutral point of view. The stuff is stuffed with adjectives which are biased much of the times. Adjectives should be done away with. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 106.219.49.154 ( talk) 04:59, 17 July 2015 (UTC)
there have been a lot of edits on this article without references. The older version was a lot more neutral. Divyraj ( talk) 15:08, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
Abul Fazl comments on the horrors of the bloody battle for the conquest of Chittor in verse as follows:
"No one ever saw such battles, Nor ever heard of such from the experienced. What shall I say of that battle and engagement, I cannot mention one item out of a hundred thousand. [1]
Divyraj ( talk) 15:13, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
References
I can understand that the casualties on Mughal side is displayed on the infobox based on the statement of Satish Chandra The siege also resulted in heavy casualties on the Mughal side, where two hundred of them were killed every day.
But wouldn't it be considered as
original research as the author doesn't give any direct statement about the casualties?
Imperial
[AFCND]
14:20, 25 December 2023 (UTC)