![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
C.H.F. asked the question could any one name the six murdered priests in Notes and Queries Volume 7 2nd S. No 169. March 26 1859 p. 258 -- PBS ( talk) 05:18, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
As but a casual visitor to this article, I formed the impression that it is too detailed and "embroidered" to qualify as encyclopedic. On closer examination, I found that slabs of the composition were actually selectively copied (and without proper attribution) from a source. E.g., most of the "Prelude" section can be found verbatim at this online source. The apparent necessity of attending to overcapitalisation is obviated by inserting quotation marks and consolidating blockquotes, which I have done as an interim measure. (I would expect that much of this detail would be discarded or précised in a re-write of the article.) My discovery of a superfluous marginal date ("A.D. 1641") within one portion of text was adequate evidence that a cut-and-paste had been done. I have not had time to closely examine the rest of the article, but would recommend that others consider doing so. Bjenks ( talk) 08:24, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
C.H.F. asked the question could any one name the six murdered priests in Notes and Queries Volume 7 2nd S. No 169. March 26 1859 p. 258 -- PBS ( talk) 05:18, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
As but a casual visitor to this article, I formed the impression that it is too detailed and "embroidered" to qualify as encyclopedic. On closer examination, I found that slabs of the composition were actually selectively copied (and without proper attribution) from a source. E.g., most of the "Prelude" section can be found verbatim at this online source. The apparent necessity of attending to overcapitalisation is obviated by inserting quotation marks and consolidating blockquotes, which I have done as an interim measure. (I would expect that much of this detail would be discarded or précised in a re-write of the article.) My discovery of a superfluous marginal date ("A.D. 1641") within one portion of text was adequate evidence that a cut-and-paste had been done. I have not had time to closely examine the rest of the article, but would recommend that others consider doing so. Bjenks ( talk) 08:24, 26 January 2014 (UTC)