This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The
contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to
pseudoscience and
fringe science, which has been
designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
|
||
This page has archives. Sections older than 60 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 3 sections are present. |
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 30 August 2021 and 13 December 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Rachelnhuang.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 09:18, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Some here claim that there exist Siddha practitioners who are licensed, trained, and thus not quacks. Please show me any shred of evidence that any such license or training requires Siddha practitioners to stop prescribing organic mercury compounds. -- Guy Macon ( talk) 15:38, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
The links provided do not justify the claims made by the author. (Link no. 2 and 3) Kpbolumbu ( talk) 16:27, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
I have read them fully. I Also have highlighted those parts for your reference. Kpbolumbu ( talk) 08:26, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
@Roxy, you might want to read them once again. Kpbolumbu ( talk) 15:32, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
Highlited this "1. Quacks with no qualification whatsoever. 2. Practitioners of Indian Medicine (Ayurvedic, Sidha, Tibb, Unani), Homeopathy, Naturopathy, commonly called Ayush, who are not qualified to practice Modern Medicine (Allopathy) but are practicing Modern Medicine. 3. Practitioners of so called integrated Medicine, Alternative System of Medicine, electro-homeopathy, indo-allopathy etc. terms which do not exist in any Act."
So, Siddha medicine is not quackery by itself according to IMA. Quackery is that which is committed by Practitioners of Indian Medicine (Ayurvedic, Sidha, Tibb, Unani), Homeopathy, Naturopathy, commonly called Ayush, who are not qualified to practice Modern Medicine (Allopathy) but are practicing Modern Medicine." I hope that this much is enough. Kpbolumbu ( talk)
Siddha Medicine is an accepted medical system by government of India under the AYUSH programme . Its not quackery. Its illegal to practice other medical systems like allopathy by certified licensed Siddha practitioners. Siddha medicine is offering a very well tested formula called Kabasura Kudineer Chooranam for COVID. It has gone through molecular and clinical studies and has been authorised by Government of India. In light of this its imperative that this article be edited. I would like to add Dr KK Aggarwal head of IMA has passed away following being vaccinated. There are millions of lives at stake . I hence propose editing of the article. Thanks Dr Sunny Sandhu MBBS AIIMS — Preceding unsigned comment added by Docsunsand ( talk • contribs) 12:23, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
The statement 'The Indian Medical Association regards Siddha medicine degrees as "fake"' is wrong as per the citation. The citation mentions that IMA regards Siddha practitioners who practice modern medicine are quacks. So please update this statement. Sanjukammath ( talk) 13:04, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
'The Indian Medical Association regards Siddha medicine degrees as "fake" and Siddha therapies as quackery, posing a danger to national health due to absence of training in science-based medicine.'
This statement is wrong as per the citation.
This is because, the page cited clearly states that
" Quacks can be divided amongst three basic categories as under :
Quacks with no qualification whatsoever.
Practitioners of Indian Medicine (Ayurvedic, Sidha, Tibb, Unani), Homeopathy, Naturopathy, commonly called Ayush, who are not qualified to practice Modern Medicine (Allopathy) but are practicing Modern Medicine.
Practitioners of so called integrated Medicine, Alternative System of Medicine, electro-homeopathy, indo-allopathy etc. terms which do not exist in any Act. "
Further the same cited page gives a table where the acts that govern the medical systems in India are clearly mentioned.
The recognition of Siddha degrees is not a matter of Indian medical association either ways. It is governed under the 'THE INDIAN MEDICINE CENTRAL COUNCIL ACT, 1970' [1] Sanjukammath ( talk) 13:25, 3 February 2022 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sanjukammath ( talk • contribs) 13:19, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The
contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to
pseudoscience and
fringe science, which has been
designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
|
||
This page has archives. Sections older than 60 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 3 sections are present. |
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 30 August 2021 and 13 December 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Rachelnhuang.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 09:18, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Some here claim that there exist Siddha practitioners who are licensed, trained, and thus not quacks. Please show me any shred of evidence that any such license or training requires Siddha practitioners to stop prescribing organic mercury compounds. -- Guy Macon ( talk) 15:38, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
The links provided do not justify the claims made by the author. (Link no. 2 and 3) Kpbolumbu ( talk) 16:27, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
I have read them fully. I Also have highlighted those parts for your reference. Kpbolumbu ( talk) 08:26, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
@Roxy, you might want to read them once again. Kpbolumbu ( talk) 15:32, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
Highlited this "1. Quacks with no qualification whatsoever. 2. Practitioners of Indian Medicine (Ayurvedic, Sidha, Tibb, Unani), Homeopathy, Naturopathy, commonly called Ayush, who are not qualified to practice Modern Medicine (Allopathy) but are practicing Modern Medicine. 3. Practitioners of so called integrated Medicine, Alternative System of Medicine, electro-homeopathy, indo-allopathy etc. terms which do not exist in any Act."
So, Siddha medicine is not quackery by itself according to IMA. Quackery is that which is committed by Practitioners of Indian Medicine (Ayurvedic, Sidha, Tibb, Unani), Homeopathy, Naturopathy, commonly called Ayush, who are not qualified to practice Modern Medicine (Allopathy) but are practicing Modern Medicine." I hope that this much is enough. Kpbolumbu ( talk)
Siddha Medicine is an accepted medical system by government of India under the AYUSH programme . Its not quackery. Its illegal to practice other medical systems like allopathy by certified licensed Siddha practitioners. Siddha medicine is offering a very well tested formula called Kabasura Kudineer Chooranam for COVID. It has gone through molecular and clinical studies and has been authorised by Government of India. In light of this its imperative that this article be edited. I would like to add Dr KK Aggarwal head of IMA has passed away following being vaccinated. There are millions of lives at stake . I hence propose editing of the article. Thanks Dr Sunny Sandhu MBBS AIIMS — Preceding unsigned comment added by Docsunsand ( talk • contribs) 12:23, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
The statement 'The Indian Medical Association regards Siddha medicine degrees as "fake"' is wrong as per the citation. The citation mentions that IMA regards Siddha practitioners who practice modern medicine are quacks. So please update this statement. Sanjukammath ( talk) 13:04, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
'The Indian Medical Association regards Siddha medicine degrees as "fake" and Siddha therapies as quackery, posing a danger to national health due to absence of training in science-based medicine.'
This statement is wrong as per the citation.
This is because, the page cited clearly states that
" Quacks can be divided amongst three basic categories as under :
Quacks with no qualification whatsoever.
Practitioners of Indian Medicine (Ayurvedic, Sidha, Tibb, Unani), Homeopathy, Naturopathy, commonly called Ayush, who are not qualified to practice Modern Medicine (Allopathy) but are practicing Modern Medicine.
Practitioners of so called integrated Medicine, Alternative System of Medicine, electro-homeopathy, indo-allopathy etc. terms which do not exist in any Act. "
Further the same cited page gives a table where the acts that govern the medical systems in India are clearly mentioned.
The recognition of Siddha degrees is not a matter of Indian medical association either ways. It is governed under the 'THE INDIAN MEDICINE CENTRAL COUNCIL ACT, 1970' [1] Sanjukammath ( talk) 13:25, 3 February 2022 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sanjukammath ( talk • contribs) 13:19, 3 February 2022 (UTC)