Thanks for the review. Since it seems Kingoflettuce is busy at the moment, I'll try and see if I can address the issues (responses below). --
Paul_012 (
talk)
05:30, 15 July 2018 (UTC)reply
Is it well written?
A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
These are my copy edits. Please review for accuracy and revert/revise if needed.
"masterpiece of punning and word play". - This quote should be attributed inline.
I've provided attribution to Thomas J. Hudak, who presumably wrote the preface to his translated volume, where the quote is sourced from. I don't have full access to the book, however, so cannot be 100% sure. --
Paul_012 (
talk)
05:30, 15 July 2018 (UTC)reply
"it has also been argued" - who is arguing? Is one position more widely accepted than another?
"Some scholars have suggested" I suggest adding "such as [specific scholar]" to avoid sounding weaselly. Same for the other scholars mentioned later in this sentence.
The first sentence of the last paragraph under Historicity makes a strong claim for consensus doesn't have a citation. I assume it came from the same source as the following sentence?
Thanks for the review. Since it seems Kingoflettuce is busy at the moment, I'll try and see if I can address the issues (responses below). --
Paul_012 (
talk)
05:30, 15 July 2018 (UTC)reply
Is it well written?
A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
These are my copy edits. Please review for accuracy and revert/revise if needed.
"masterpiece of punning and word play". - This quote should be attributed inline.
I've provided attribution to Thomas J. Hudak, who presumably wrote the preface to his translated volume, where the quote is sourced from. I don't have full access to the book, however, so cannot be 100% sure. --
Paul_012 (
talk)
05:30, 15 July 2018 (UTC)reply
"it has also been argued" - who is arguing? Is one position more widely accepted than another?
"Some scholars have suggested" I suggest adding "such as [specific scholar]" to avoid sounding weaselly. Same for the other scholars mentioned later in this sentence.
The first sentence of the last paragraph under Historicity makes a strong claim for consensus doesn't have a citation. I assume it came from the same source as the following sentence?