![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
I'm going to remove the tag because whoever tagged the article didn't say why they did so here, rendering it useless. Theshibboleth 18:10, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
This article needs to be rewritten. It seems like an advertisement at this point, and I don't think that simply patching it up is going to help it very easily. The new version will first have to assert notability, then go on to explain the circumstances under which the foundation was created and the events leading up to that point, as well as a history of its existence, and then state some information on the things the foundation does. —msikma ( user, talk) 14:40, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
This page contained a full list of Shuttleworth Foundation fellows. This list was deleted as "non-notable people".
Notability guidelines in Wikipedia apply to pages, but not to the content within them. (Notability guidelines can also apply to the content of lists, but this is for cases where the page *is* a list – this is not one of those cases.)
I've raised this concern on the editor's talk page. I'm leaving a note here as well. I have conflict of interest, but if there's no response here I plan to revert this deletion one week from now. I hope that's okay.
Madeleine ✉ ✍ 21:41, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
Bear in mind that in February 2017 this page was updated to show all the Fellows, past and present because several female Fellows had been excluded and only some male Fellows had been shown. Listing all Fellows was a response to perceived favoring of male Fellows. Angrynative ( talk) 00:59, 10 September 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Angrynative ( talk • contribs) 23:26, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
I'm going to echo the call to restore the list - it's relevant to the article as the foundation's primary work is the fellowship. Removing the list of fellows is silly, and as noted only showing some of the fellows creates a NPOV issue. Seanbonner ( talk) 05:02, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Shuttleworth Foundation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 16:36, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
I'm going to remove the tag because whoever tagged the article didn't say why they did so here, rendering it useless. Theshibboleth 18:10, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
This article needs to be rewritten. It seems like an advertisement at this point, and I don't think that simply patching it up is going to help it very easily. The new version will first have to assert notability, then go on to explain the circumstances under which the foundation was created and the events leading up to that point, as well as a history of its existence, and then state some information on the things the foundation does. —msikma ( user, talk) 14:40, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
This page contained a full list of Shuttleworth Foundation fellows. This list was deleted as "non-notable people".
Notability guidelines in Wikipedia apply to pages, but not to the content within them. (Notability guidelines can also apply to the content of lists, but this is for cases where the page *is* a list – this is not one of those cases.)
I've raised this concern on the editor's talk page. I'm leaving a note here as well. I have conflict of interest, but if there's no response here I plan to revert this deletion one week from now. I hope that's okay.
Madeleine ✉ ✍ 21:41, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
Bear in mind that in February 2017 this page was updated to show all the Fellows, past and present because several female Fellows had been excluded and only some male Fellows had been shown. Listing all Fellows was a response to perceived favoring of male Fellows. Angrynative ( talk) 00:59, 10 September 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Angrynative ( talk • contribs) 23:26, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
I'm going to echo the call to restore the list - it's relevant to the article as the foundation's primary work is the fellowship. Removing the list of fellows is silly, and as noted only showing some of the fellows creates a NPOV issue. Seanbonner ( talk) 05:02, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Shuttleworth Foundation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 16:36, 15 January 2018 (UTC)