![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | The content of this article has been derived in whole or part from
http://www.erowid.org/library/books_online/pihkal/pihkal.shtml. Permission has been received from the copyright holder to release this material . Evidence of this has been confirmed and stored by
VRT volunteers, under ticket number
2006040910001231. This template is used by approved volunteers dealing with the Wikimedia volunteer response team system (VRTS) after receipt of a clear statement of permission at permissions-en ![]() |
Part 2 of PiHKAL may be distributed for non-commerical reproduction provided that the introductory information, copyright notice, cautionary notice and ordering information remain attached.
Miserlou 03:18, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
I don't like just copying a chunk out of the book, but the copyright does let us do that, I think.
The article does still need a rewrite and wikification, but there's no need for the copyright notice anymore. Miserlou 03:25, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
I bet you're a real douche. Miserlou 04:17, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
Where's the line between a copyvio / license vio, and a reference to information in a book? How about email Shulgin and ask permission to use it? --
Thoric
04:21, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
Can the Shulgin Rating Scale itself be included in this article? It can be found in the history [1], with original copyright notice attached, and the text was found here. Reprinting it seems like it may be permissable under fair use, as it is scientific, encyclopedic information, consisting solely of the rating scale itself. -- He: ah? 02:57, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
i think we should give it a little while, Keenan. I don't see the problem with it remaining a stub until the copyright issue is sorted out, at the very least. -- He: ah? 02:59, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
Well done! Miserlou 04:03, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | The content of this article has been derived in whole or part from
http://www.erowid.org/library/books_online/pihkal/pihkal.shtml. Permission has been received from the copyright holder to release this material . Evidence of this has been confirmed and stored by
VRT volunteers, under ticket number
2006040910001231. This template is used by approved volunteers dealing with the Wikimedia volunteer response team system (VRTS) after receipt of a clear statement of permission at permissions-en ![]() |
Part 2 of PiHKAL may be distributed for non-commerical reproduction provided that the introductory information, copyright notice, cautionary notice and ordering information remain attached.
Miserlou 03:18, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
I don't like just copying a chunk out of the book, but the copyright does let us do that, I think.
The article does still need a rewrite and wikification, but there's no need for the copyright notice anymore. Miserlou 03:25, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
I bet you're a real douche. Miserlou 04:17, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
Where's the line between a copyvio / license vio, and a reference to information in a book? How about email Shulgin and ask permission to use it? --
Thoric
04:21, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
Can the Shulgin Rating Scale itself be included in this article? It can be found in the history [1], with original copyright notice attached, and the text was found here. Reprinting it seems like it may be permissable under fair use, as it is scientific, encyclopedic information, consisting solely of the rating scale itself. -- He: ah? 02:57, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
i think we should give it a little while, Keenan. I don't see the problem with it remaining a stub until the copyright issue is sorted out, at the very least. -- He: ah? 02:59, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
Well done! Miserlou 04:03, 9 April 2006 (UTC)